Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #14250

closed

Make `$SAFE` process global state and allow to set 0 again

Added by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) almost 7 years ago. Updated almost 7 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Target version:
[ruby-core:84519]

Description

$SAFE > 1 is removed from Ruby 2.3 and there are some opinion to remove $SAFE feature ([Feature #5455]).
There are several reason, but the biggest reason I think is nobody use $SAFE correctly.

Also current $SAFE is thread/proc local information and it hurts performance (we need to restore $SAFE information just after returning proc, even if returning by exception).

Matz said $SAFE == 1 is similar to warning and it is not a security feature, but one of the programming tool we can use to improve our program ($SAFE == 3 was for sandbox, security feature).

From this perspective, Matz approved us the followings:

  • $SAFE is process global, not a Proc local state.
  • We can set $SAFE == 0 when $SAFE == 1.

I think we can't make big project with the above changes (how to make multi-thread programming with this $SAFE?), but $SAFE seems for small project (so-called scripting). Anyway if nobody use it, no problem on these changes.

I will commit this change soon.
Please try new spec and point out any problem you got.

Thanks,
Koichi


Files

gems-using-safe.txt (15.1 KB) gems-using-safe.txt mame (Yusuke Endoh), 12/28/2017 02:31 AM

Related issues 2 (0 open2 closed)

Related to Ruby master - Feature #14256: Deprecate $SAFE support in ERB and let ERB.new take keyword arguments for itClosedk0kubun (Takashi Kokubun)Actions
Related to Ruby master - Bug #14353: $SAFE should stay at least thread-local for compatibilityClosedmatz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)Actions

Updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler) almost 7 years ago

Can not comment on $SAFE but I personally have not used $SAFE so far in
like +10 years or so. I can only remember the pickaxe mentioning it, but
I have not used it in any of my ruby code.

A bit off-topic but does anyone remember if _why's old ruby sandbox (the
online irb, I think), made use of it? For such projects, trivial ways
to control how "safe" the ruby is, may be more useful. E. g. in any
restricted environment such as that.

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) almost 7 years ago

FYI: by using gem-codesearch, I have briefly searched the gems using $SAFE:

$ csearch -f '.*\.rb' '^\s*[^\s#].*\$SAFE *=' | wc -l
147

Much less than I thought... The full list is attached.

Actions #3

Updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun) almost 7 years ago

Actions #4

Updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun) almost 7 years ago

Actions #5

Updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun) almost 7 years ago

  • Related to Feature #14256: Deprecate $SAFE support in ERB and let ERB.new take keyword arguments for it added
Actions #6

Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) almost 7 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Closed

Applied in changeset trunk|r61510.


$SAFE as a process global state. [Feature #14250]

  • vm_core.h (rb_vm_t): move rb_execution_context_t::safe_level to
    rb_vm_t::safe_level_ because $SAFE is a process (VM) global state.

  • vm_core.h (rb_proc_t): remove rb_proc_t::safe_level because Proc
    objects don't need to keep $SAFE at the creation.
    Also make is_from_method and is_lambda as 1 bit fields.

  • cont.c (cont_restore_thread): no need to keep $SAFE for Continuation.

  • eval.c (ruby_cleanup): use rb_set_safe_level_force() instead of access
    vm->safe_level_ directly.

  • eval_jump.c: End procs END{} doesn't keep $SAFE.

  • proc.c (proc_dup): removed and introduce rb_proc_dup in vm.c.

  • safe.c (rb_set_safe_level): don't check $SAFE 1 -> 0 changes.

  • safe.c (safe_setter): use rb_set_safe_level().

  • thread.c (rb_thread_safe_level): Thread#safe_level returns $SAFE.
    It should be obsolete.

  • transcode.c (load_transcoder_entry): rb_safe_level() only returns
    0 or 1 so that this check is not needed.

  • vm.c (vm_proc_create_from_captured): don't need to keep $SAFE for Proc.

  • vm.c (rb_proc_create): renamed to proc_create.

  • vm.c (rb_proc_dup): moved from proc.c.

  • vm.c (vm_invoke_proc): do not need to set and restore $SAFE
    for Proc#call.

  • vm_eval.c (rb_eval_cmd): rename a local variable to represent clearer
    meaning.

  • lib/drb/drb.rb: restore $SAFE.

  • lib/erb.rb: restore $SAFE, too.

  • test/lib/leakchecker.rb: check $SAFE == 0 at the end of tests.

  • test/rubygems/test_gem.rb: do not set $SAFE = 1.

  • bootstraptest/test_proc.rb: catch up this change.

  • spec/ruby/optional/capi/string_spec.rb: ditto.

  • test/bigdecimal/test_bigdecimal.rb: ditto.

  • test/fiddle/test_func.rb: ditto.

  • test/fiddle/test_handle.rb: ditto.

  • test/net/imap/test_imap_response_parser.rb: ditto.

  • test/pathname/test_pathname.rb: ditto.

  • test/readline/test_readline.rb: ditto.

  • test/ruby/test_file.rb: ditto.

  • test/ruby/test_optimization.rb: ditto.

  • test/ruby/test_proc.rb: ditto.

  • test/ruby/test_require.rb: ditto.

  • test/ruby/test_thread.rb: ditto.

  • test/rubygems/test_gem_specification.rb: ditto.

  • test/test_tempfile.rb: ditto.

  • test/test_tmpdir.rb: ditto.

  • test/win32ole/test_win32ole.rb: ditto.

  • test/win32ole/test_win32ole_event.rb: ditto.

Actions #7

Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) almost 7 years ago

  • Related to Bug #14353: $SAFE should stay at least thread-local for compatibility added
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0