Feature #9969
closedAdd File.empty? as alias to File.zero?
Description
Could we alias File.empty? to File.zero? ?
The latter already exists. I tried to use File.empty?
and then thought it would not exist, but the code
already exists, it is just called File.zero? instead.
Updated by zzak (zzak _) over 10 years ago
- Tracker changed from Bug to Feature
- Priority changed from 3 to Normal
- Target version set to 2.2.0
Updated by lucasbuchala (Lucas Buchala) almost 9 years ago
I added a comment on issue #10121 before knowing this specific issue already existed.
I just wanted to say that, with the arrival of Dir.empty?, I like the idea of the File.empty? alias for the reason of having some symmetry between Dir and File methods.
Updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) over 8 years ago
OK, agreed.
Matz.
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) over 8 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Applied in changeset r54559.
file.c: File.empty?
- file.c (Init_File): add alias File.empty? to File.zero?.
[Feature #9969]
Updated by backus (John Backus) over 8 years ago
For the sake of consistency could you also add Pathname#empty?
. Alternatively maybe add both Pathname#empty_file?
and Pathname#empty_directory?
. It is probably important to keep Pathname
consistent with File
and/or Dir
since the tool is much less useful if you sometimes have to fallback to File
or Dir
for certain use cases
Updated by duerst (Martin Dürst) over 8 years ago
John, this feature is already closed. If you want your proposal to be
looked at, please open a new one, referencing this one.
Thanks, Martin.
On 2016/07/18 12:56, johncbackus@gmail.com wrote:
Issue #9969 has been updated by John Backus.
For the sake of consistency could you also add
Pathname#empty?
Feature #9969: Add File.empty? as alias to File.zero?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9969#change-59632
- Author: Robert A. Heiler
- Status: Closed
- Priority: Normal
- Assignee:
Could we alias File.empty? to File.zero? ?
The latter already exists. I tried to use File.empty?
and then thought it would not exist, but the code
already exists, it is just called File.zero? instead.