Misc #15342: DevelopersMeeting20181212Japan

• Status: Closed
• Assignee: -

[mame (Yusuke Endoh)]

Please comment your favorite ticket numbers you want to ask to discuss with your SHORT comment or summary.
(your summary/comment will help us because we don't need to read all of ticket comments)

DO NOT discuss then on this ticket, please.

---

Date: 2018/12/12 (Wed)
Time: 13:30-17:00 (JST)
Place: pixiv Inc. (Tokyo, Japan)
Sign-up: https://ruby.connpass.com/event/111192/
log: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q22gVRNbCIYOQw2djH4UPmT0gxVoBKvjvs0MqX5ILcU/pub
logedit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q22gVRNbCIYOQw2djH4UPmT0gxVoBKvjvs0MqX5ILcU/edit

NOTES

• Dev meeting IS NOT a decision making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
• Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
• Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
• We will write a log about discussion to a file or to each ticket in English.
• All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
• The date, time and place is scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.

Agenda

Next dev-meeting

About 2.6 timeframe

Check security tickets

Carry-over from previous meeting(s)

From Attendees

• [Bug #15303] Return tracepoint doesn't fire when tailcall optimization is applied (ko1)
  • tailcall skips return event and it breaks a debugger's logic. there are several ideas, and we need to introduce a solution for ruby 2.6.
• [Feature #15287] New TracePoint events to support loading features (ko1)
  • I already introduced script_compiled TracePoint event. We need to decide related methods.

From non-attendees

---

Please comment your favorite ticket we need to discuss with the following format.

* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
  * your comment why you want to put this ticket here if you want to add.

Your comment is very important if you are no attendee because we can not ask why you want to discuss about it.

Example:

* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
  * I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss about this feature.

I don't guarantee to put tickets in agenda if the comment violate the format (because it is hard to copy&paste).

[mame (Yusuke Endoh)]

• Related to Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeeting added

[mame (Yusuke Endoh)]

• Description updated (diff)

[mame (Yusuke Endoh)]

• Description updated (diff)

[aycabta (aycabta .)]

• [Feature #13581] Syntax sugar for method reference

[janfri (Jan Friedrich)]

• [Feature #10771] An easy way to get the source location of a constant

[osyo (manga osyo)]

• [Feature #15373] Proposal: Enable refinements to #method and #instance_method
• [Feature #15374] Proposal: Enable refinements to #method_missing
  • I want to more refinements!

[methodmissing (Lourens Naudé)]

[Feature #15007] Proposal: Introduce support for cold function attributes (clang and GCC) - reduced scope PR https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2005 (rb_memerror, rb_bug, rb_warn)

[shia (Sangyong Sim)]

• [Bug #15394] Ruby adds unexpected HTTP header value when using symbol key
  • This is a small change I think, but could make codes less buggy

[ko1 (Koichi Sasada)]

• Description updated (diff)

[aycabta (aycabta .)]

• [Bug #15114] Ruby で定義したメソッドに &:hoge を渡しても refinements が有効にならない
• [Feature #14609] Kernel#p without args shows the receiver

[naruse (Yui NARUSE)]

• Status changed from Open to Closed