Feature #11541: Let attr_accessor, _reader & _writer return symbols of the defined methods

• Status: Closed
• Assignee: -
• Target version: -

[iGEL (Johannes Barre)]

Since Ruby 2.1, def returns a symbol with the name of the just defined method, so you can easily pass it to visibility modifiers like private, protected, and public. Why not let attr_reader & friends return an array with the names of the defined methods, so we can easily write:

private attr_reader :method1, :method2

To fully support the example above, private would be required to accept also arrays with method names. Without it, it would require the star syntax, which would already be an improvement:

private *attr_reader :method1, :method2

I wrote two test cases to better illustrate the impact:

test/ruby/test_module.rb:

  def test_attr_return_value
    c = Class.new

    assert_equal(%i(reader1 reader2), c.class_eval { attr_reader(:reader1, :reader2) })
    assert_equal(%i(writer1= writer2=), c.class_eval { attr_writer(:writer1, :writer2) })
    assert_equal(%i(accessor1 accessor1= accessor2 accessor2=), c.class_eval { attr_accessor(:accessor1, :accessor2) })
  end

test/ruby/test_method.rb:

  def test_visibility_modifier_with_array
    c = Class.new do
      def m1; end
      def m2; end
    end

    c.class_eval { private %i(m1 m2) }
    assert(c.private_method_defined?(:m1))
    assert(c.private_method_defined?(:m2))

    c.class_eval { protected %w(m1 m2) }
    assert(c.protected_method_defined?(:m1))
    assert(c.protected_method_defined?(:m2))

    c.class_eval { public :m1, [:m2] } # Not sure if this should be allowed.
    assert(c.public_method_defined?(:m1))
    assert(c.public_method_defined?(:m2))

    assert_raise(NameError) do
      c.class_eval { private %i(m1 m2 m3) }
    end
    assert(c.private_method_defined?(:m1))
    assert(c.private_method_defined?(:m2))

    assert_raise(TypeError) do
      c.class_eval { protected [:m1, 2] }
    end
    assert(c.private_method_defined?(:m1))

    assert_raise(TypeError) do
      c.class_eval { public [:m1, [:m2]] } # Not sure about this case. Should it be allowed?
    end
    assert(c.public_method_defined?(:m1))
  end

WDYT? Thank you!

[pitr.ch (Petr Chalupa)]

+1, this is also very useful for low level concurrency proposals. It allows to write public attr :status, atomic: true where attr returns array of 4 defined atomic helper methods. The array is accepted by public method which modifies the visibility of the helpers.

[Eregon (Benoit Daloze)]

• Related to Feature #12019: Better low-level support for writing concurrent libraries added

[Eregon (Benoit Daloze)]

• Related to Feature #14397: public, protected and private should return their arguments instead of self added

[gfx (Goro FUJI)]

+1

I'm about to issue the same feature request😆

[shevegen (Robert A. Heiler)]

I don't have a big pro or con opinion (am neutral here), but perhaps we could move this
to an upcoming developer meeting anyway?

[Eregon (Benoit Daloze)]

• Related to Feature #6470: Make attr_accessor return the list of generated method added

[znz (Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA)]

• Related to Feature #9453: Return symbols of defined methods for `attr` and friends added

[znz (Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA)]

• Related to Feature #13560: Module#attr_ methods return reasonable values added

[marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)]

• Status changed from Open to Closed

Shipped in Ruby 3.0

[hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)]

• Project changed from 14 to Ruby master