Feature #9253
openRegexp named match and case statement
Description
Hello,
I've notice there's no mean to use captured named matches with case
statement :
> a, b = "foo bar", nil
=> ["foo bar", nil]
>   case a
>     when /foo (?<b>bar)/ then p b
>   end
nil
This is not critical, because we can use $1, $2 and friends in place, but it
certainly would be nice and less surprising if it worked.
NB : btw, the link "How to report" [1] from tracker home page [2] is a 404.
[1] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/HowtoReport
[2] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
        
          
          Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) almost 12 years ago
          
          
        
        
      
      There is a way to capture it: use $~[:b] instead of b. Nonetheless, I like this proposal.
--
Yusuke Endoh mame@tsg.ne.jp
        
          
          Updated by oelmekki (Olivier El Mekki) almost 12 years ago
          
          
        
        
      
      I didn't know of this syntax, thanks Yusuke.
mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote:
There is a way to capture it: use $~[:b] instead of b. Nonetheless, I like this proposal.
--
Yusuke Endoh mame@tsg.ne.jp
        
          
          Updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler) almost 12 years ago
          
          
        
        
      
      Indeed, I did not know of $~[:b] either. Quite nice.
        
          
          Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) almost 12 years ago
          
          
        
        
      
      - Target version changed from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0
 
        
          
          Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) almost 8 years ago
          
          
        
        
      
      - Target version deleted (
2.2.0)