Feature #836
closedPatches for StringScanner, adding #size, #captures and #values_at
Added by apeiros (Stefan Rusterholz) almost 16 years ago. Updated almost 7 years ago.
Description
=begin
The methods are named to be consistent with MatchData.
My C-fu isn't very strong, so a review of the patch would be appreciated.
I attached the revised code and a diff file. If other formats are wished, please tell.
If I need to submit something else with that patch, please tell.
Regards
Stefan
=end
Files
strscan.c (38.2 KB) strscan.c | apeiros (Stefan Rusterholz), 12/08/2008 11:27 AM | ||
strscan.diff (3.12 KB) strscan.diff | apeiros (Stefan Rusterholz), 12/08/2008 11:27 AM |
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) almost 16 years ago
Hi,
At Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:20:55 +0900,
Stefan Rusterholz wrote in [ruby-core:20412]:
The methods are named to be consistent with MatchData.
My C-fu isn't very strong, so a review of the patch would be appreciated.
I attached the revised code and a diff file. If other formats are wished, please tell.
If I need to submit something else with that patch, please tell.
- Variable declaration is disallowed after executing statements.
- call-seq: for captures was `size'.
Index: ext/strscan/strscan.c
===================================================================
--- ext/strscan/strscan.c (revision 20570)
+++ ext/strscan/strscan.c (working copy)
@@ -964,4 +964,90 @@ strscan_aref(VALUE self, VALUE idx)
/*
+ * call-seq: size
+ *
+ * Return the amount of subgroups in the most recent match.
+ * The full match counts as a subgroup.
+ *
+ * s = StringScanner.new("Fri Dec 12 1975 14:39")
+ * s.scan(/(\w+) (\w+) (\d+) /) # -> "Fri Dec 12 "
+ * s.size # -> 4
+ */
+static VALUE
+strscan_size(VALUE self)
+{
+ struct strscanner *p;
+
+ GET_SCANNER(self, p);
+ if (! MATCHED_P(p)) return Qnil;
+ return INT2FIX(p->regs.num_regs);
+}
+
+/*
+ * call-seq: captures
+ *
+ * Returns the subgroups in the most recent match (not including the full match).
+ * If nothing was priorly matched, it returns nil.
+ *
+ * s = StringScanner.new("Fri Dec 12 1975 14:39")
+ * s.scan(/(\w+) (\w+) (\d+) /) # -> "Fri Dec 12 "
+ * s.captures # -> ["Fri", "Dec", "12"]
+ * s.scan(/(\w+) (\w+) (\d+) /) # -> nil
+ * s.captures # -> nil
+ */
+static VALUE
+strscan_captures(VALUE self)
+{
+ struct strscanner *p;
+ int i, num_regs;
+ VALUE new_ary;
+
+ GET_SCANNER(self, p);
+ if (! MATCHED_P(p)) return Qnil;
+
+ num_regs = p->regs.num_regs;
+ new_ary = rb_ary_new2(num_regs);
+
+ for (i = 1; i < num_regs; i++) {
+ VALUE str = extract_range(p, p->prev + p->regs.beg[i],
+ p->prev + p->regs.end[i]);
+ rb_ary_push(new_ary, str);
+ }
+
+ return new_ary;
+}
+
+/*
+ * call-seq:
+ * scanner.values_at( i1, i2, ... iN ) -> an_array
+ *
+ * Returns the subgroups in the most recent match at the given indices.
+ * If nothing was priorly matched, it returns nil.
+ *
+ * s = StringScanner.new("Fri Dec 12 1975 14:39")
+ * s.scan(/(\w+) (\w+) (\d+) /) # -> "Fri Dec 12 "
+ * s.values_at 0, -1, 5, 2 # -> ["Fri Dec 12 ", "12", nil, "Dec"]
+ * s.scan(/(\w+) (\w+) (\d+) /) # -> nil
+ * s.captures # -> nil
+ */
+
+static VALUE
+strscan_values_at(int argc, VALUE *argv, VALUE self)
+{
+ struct strscanner *p;
+ long i;
+ VALUE new_ary;
+
+ GET_SCANNER(self, p);
+ if (! MATCHED_P(p)) return Qnil;
+
+ new_ary = rb_ary_new2(argc);
+ for (i = 0; i<argc; i++) {
+ rb_ary_push(new_ary, strscan_aref(self, argv[i]));
+ }
+
+ return new_ary;
+}
+
+/*
* Return the <i><b>pre</b>-match</i> (in the regular expression sense) of the last scan.
*
@@ -1312,4 +1398,7 @@ Init_strscan(void)
rb_define_method(StringScanner, "pre_match", strscan_pre_match, 0);
rb_define_method(StringScanner, "post_match", strscan_post_match, 0);
+ rb_define_method(StringScanner, "size", strscan_size, 0);
+ rb_define_method(StringScanner, "captures", strscan_captures, 0);
+ rb_define_method(StringScanner, "values_at", strscan_values_at, -1);
rb_define_method(StringScanner, "rest", strscan_rest, 0);
--
Nobu Nakada
Updated by apeiros (Stefan Rusterholz) almost 16 years ago
Hi Nobu
Kind thanks for taking a look at my patch.
On 08.12.2008 at 18:27 Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
| Variable declaration is disallowed after executing statements.
Ah, good to know. I hope I will remember next time!
Can I setup extconfig.rb so that gcc will warn me if I did that?
| call-seq: for captures was `size'.
Whoops. "Too close" syndrome I guess :) Thanks for pointing that out.
Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) almost 16 years ago
- Assignee set to nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
Updated by znz (Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA) over 14 years ago
- Target version set to 2.0.0
Updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) over 14 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Assigned
Updated by drbrain (Eric Hodel) over 13 years ago
- Category set to lib
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) almost 13 years ago
Nobu, do you think that this proposal can be accepted?
There is no maintainer for strscan; I leave this decision
to your discretion.
--
Yusuke Endoh mame@tsg.ne.jp
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 12 years ago
Seems fine to me.
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) almost 12 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.0.0 to 2.6
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) almost 7 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
Applied in changeset trunk|r60929.
strscan.c: add MatchData-like methods
- ext/strscan/strscan.c: added
size
,captures
andvalues_at
to StringScanner, shorthands of accessing the matched data.
based on the patch by apeiros (Stefan Rusterholz) at
[ruby-core:20412]. [Feature #836]