Actions
Misc #21019
closedDevMeeting-2025-02-13
Status:
Closed
Assignee:
-
Description
The next dev meeting¶
Date: 2025/02/13 13:00-17:00 (JST)
Log: https://github.com/ruby/dev-meeting-log/blob/master/2025/DevMeeting-2025-02-13.md
- Dev meeting IS NOT a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
- Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
- Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
- We will write a record of the discussion in the file or to each ticket in English.
- All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
- The date, time and place of the meeting are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.
- DO NOT discuss then on this ticket, please.
Call for agenda items¶
If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format:
* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
* Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.)
Example:
* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
* I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature.
- It is recommended to add a comment by 2025/02/10. We hold a preparatory meeting to create an agenda a few days before the dev-meeting.
- The format is strict. We'll use this script to automatically create an markdown-style agenda. We may ignore a comment that does not follow the format.
- Your comment is mandatory. We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time. We appreciate it if you could write a short summary and update from a previous discussion.
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) about 1 month ago
- Related to Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeeting added
Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) about 1 month ago
- [Bug #20998] rb_str_locktmp() changes flags of frozen strings and string literals (eregon)
- Current behavior on frozen strings is buggy (should not mutate the flags of possibly-shared frozen strings).
- What should be the behavior for rb_str_locktmp() on frozen strings? No-op or raise error (e.g. FrozenError)?
Updated by peterzhu2118 (Peter Zhu) about 1 month ago
- [Feature #21084] Declare objects have weak references (peterzhu2118)
- The current way of marking weak references uses
rb_gc_mark_weak(VALUE *ptr)
. - This presents challenges because Ruby's GC is incremental, meaning that if the
ptr
changes (e.g. realloc'd or free'd), then we could have an invalid memory access. - This also overwrites
*ptr = Qundef
if*ptr
is dead, which prevents any cleanup to be run (e.g. freeing memory or deleting entries from hash tables). - This ticket proposes
rb_gc_declare_weak_references
which declares that an object has weak references and calls a cleanup function after marking, allowing the object to clean up any memory for dead objects.
- The current way of marking weak references uses
Updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun) 16 days ago
ยท Edited
- [Feature #21116] Extract RJIT as a third-party gem (k0kubun)
- Are we okay with removing RJIT (
--rjit
) from the Ruby core?
- Are we okay with removing RJIT (
Updated by byroot (Jean Boussier) 14 days ago
- [Bug #21102] Unexpected encoding when concatenating ASCII string with ASCII compatible string (toy)
- Should
ascii_string + utf8_string
return an ASCII or UTF-8 string when both have 7bit coderange?
- Should
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 9 days ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Actions
Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0