Bug #11230
closedShould rb_struct_s_members() be public API?
Description
rb_struct_s_members() is declared in include/ruby/intern.h.
However it seems this is a fairly internal API as it returns an hidden Array.
For instance, there was a try to specify the behavior in
https://github.com/rubinius/rubinius/commit/2642a30c57973987d2a7b7e85b3ce1e78100a31b
but that produces only erratic behavior on MRI because that usage is not intended.
A valid usage might be:
static VALUE get_struct_member(VALUE self, VALUE obj, VALUE i) {
return RARRAY_AREF(rb_struct_s_members(obj), NUM2INT(i));
}
p get_struct_member(Struct.new(:a, :bb), 1)
But do we need such access and is it worth exposing a potentially dangerous function like this?
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) over 3 years ago
At the April 2021 developer meeting, it was decided to remove this C-API function after Ruby 3.2.
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) almost 2 years ago
I submitted a pull request to remove the prototype from the public header files: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/7141
rb_struct_s_members
is still an exported symbol as it is used internally by marshal.c
.
One of reasons stated to remove this method is that it returns a hidden Array. However, rb_struct_members
appears to return the same hidden Array (that method is also used internally by marshal.c
). Should we consider removing rb_struct_members
from the public API as well?
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) almost 2 years ago
Discussed at the dev meeting.
When we considered removing rb_struct_s_members two years ago, we did not find its use in a major gem. Therefore, we agreed to remove it once.
However, two years have passed since then, and now we have found that oj gem is using it.
$ gem-codesearch rb_struct_s_members | sort
...
2023-02-01 /srv/gems/oj-3.14.1/ext/oj/custom.c: ma = rb_struct_s_members(clas);
2023-02-01 /srv/gems/oj-3.14.1/ext/oj/dump_object.c: VALUE ma = rb_struct_s_members(clas);
2023-02-01 /srv/gems/oj-3.14.1/ext/oj/rails.c: ma = rb_struct_s_members(rb_obj_class(obj));
It's possible to fix oj gem and have a deprecation warning period. However, it would be easier to just keep this C API, unless there is a strong reason why we really have to remove it.
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) almost 2 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Rejected