Bug #20586
closedSome filesystem calls in dir.c are missing error handling and can return incorrect results if interrupted
Description
Background¶
Hey! I work for Datadog on the Ruby profiler part of the datadog
(previously ddtrace
) gem.
A customer reached out with an issue where enabling the profiler made Dir.glob
return no files for a given folder:
Without profiler:
irb(main):002:0> Dir.glob('/gcsfuse/t*')
=> ["/gcsfuse/test.html", "/gcsfuse/test.txt"]
With profiler:
irb(main):002:0> Dir.glob('/gcsfuse/t*')
=> []
It turns out the issue is related to missing error handling in dir.c
.
The Datadog Ruby profiler, like stackprof, pf2 and vernier, uses unix signals to interrupt the currently-active thread and take a sample (usually SIGPROF
). When some system calls get interrupted by a signal, they return an EINTR error code back to the caller.
Consider for instance the implementation of dir_each_entry
in dir.c
:
static VALUE
dir_each_entry(VALUE dir, VALUE (*each)(VALUE, VALUE), VALUE arg, int children_only)
{
struct dir_data *dirp;
struct dirent *dp;
IF_NORMALIZE_UTF8PATH(int norm_p);
GetDIR(dir, dirp);
rewinddir(dirp->dir);
IF_NORMALIZE_UTF8PATH(norm_p = need_normalization(dirp->dir, RSTRING_PTR(dirp->path)));
while ((dp = READDIR(dirp->dir, dirp->enc)) != NULL) {
// ... do things
}
return dir;
}
If READDIR
returns NULL
, then dir_each_entry
assumes it has iterated the entire directory. But looking at the man page for readdir
we see the following sharp edge (emphasis mine):
It returns NULL on reaching the end of the directory stream or if an error occurred.
So what's happening in this situation is: readdir
gets interrupted, returns NULL
+ sets errno to EINTR
. But dir_each_entry
doesn't check errno
, so rather than raising an exception to flag the issue, it treats it as if the end of the directory has been reached.
How to reproduce¶
Reproducing this is somewhat annoying, because it's dependent on timing: the signal must arrive at the exact time the dir API is getting executed.
I was able to reproduce this every time by using the google cloud gcsfuse
tool. This somewhat makes sense -- a remote filesystem is much slower than a local one, so there's a much bigger window of opportunity for a signal to arrive while the system call is blocked.
Here's an example I included in https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/pull/3720:
# Not shown: Set up a trial google cloud account, install gcsfuse, create a cloud storage bucket and put in some test files
$ gcsfuse test_fs_dd_trace_rb fuse-testing/
$ ls fuse-testing/
hello.txt test.html test.txt
# Not shown: Add `datadog` gem to `Gemfile`
$ DD_PROFILING_ENABLED=true DD_PROFILING_DIR_INTERRUPTION_WORKAROUND_ENABLED=false bundle exec ddprofrb exec ruby -e "Datadog::Profiling.wait_until_running; pp Dir.children('fuse-testing/')"
[]
Let me know if you'd like me to try to create a reproducer that does not depend on the datadog
gem.
Additional notes¶
I've spent quite some time looking at the dir.c
sources, and here's the full list of APIs that suffer from issues:
-
dir_each_entry
does not checkerrno
; all of its users have interruption bugs -
dir_tell
will return -1 instead of the correct position (which means that passing -1 todir_seek
/dir_set_pos
will cause it to not list the directory properly) -
do_opendir
an error in system calls will only sometimes be turned into a raised exception- Indirect callers that pass in rb_glob_error as errfunc: rb_glob, Dir.[], Dir.glob
- Indirect callers that pass in 0 as errfunc: ruby_glob, ruby_brace_glob
-
glob_opendir
does not check errno; all of its users have interruption bugs -
glob_getent
does not check errno; all of its users have interruption bugs -
nogvl_dir_empty_p
does not check errno (of readdir! it actually checks for opendir); all of its users have interruption bugs
Less sure about these:
-
do_stat
/do_lstat
will turn errors into warnings (unclear if enabled or disabled by default) -
need_normalization
callsfgetattrlist
/getattrlist
and all errors(ret != 0)
are treated in the same way -
rb_glob_error
is andrb_glob_caller
leave exceptions as pending and rely on callers to raise them properly - Error handling of
rb_home_dir_of
andrb_default_home_dir
are a bit suspicious
As a workaround in the Datadog Ruby profiler, in https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/pull/3720 I've added monkey patches to all of the Ruby-level APIs that use the above functions and mask out SIGPROF
so these calls are never interrupted.
This solution is does successfully work around the issue, although it prevents the profiler from sampling during these system calls, which will mean less visibility if e.g. these calls are taking a long time. And well, maintaining monkey patches is always problematic for future Ruby compatibility.
Files
Updated by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) 6 months ago
There's a "related" issue in dir.c which is that it sometimes blocking system calls are performed while Ruby is still holding the GVL, thus blocking the entire VM. I've filed a separate ticket for that -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20587 .
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 6 months ago
How would you like to fix it?
IMO, it would be reasonable to have Dir.glob
raise an exception when readdir
fails. The spec of readdir says:
Applications wishing to check for error situations should set errno to 0 before calling readdir(). If errno is set to non-zero on return, an error occurred.
Do you want Ruby to automatically retry when readdir returns EINTR
? If so, I am unsure because neither the manpage you linked nor the spec indicate that readdir may fail with EINTR
.
Have you actually confirmed that readdir is returning EINTR
? If so, it could be a bug in the OS. However, if such a bug exists in major platforms, it may be unavoidable for Ruby to handle it.
Updated by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) 6 months ago
- File readdir-bug-repro.c readdir-bug-repro.c added
mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote in #note-2:
How would you like to fix it?
IMO, it would be reasonable to have
Dir.glob
raise an exception whenreaddir
fails. The spec of readdir says:Applications wishing to check for error situations should set errno to 0 before calling readdir(). If errno is set to non-zero on return, an error occurred.
Do you want Ruby to automatically retry when readdir returns
EINTR
? If so, I am unsure because neither the manpage you linked nor the spec indicate that readdir may fail withEINTR
.
I believe the correct thing to do is to raise an exception. This will mean profiling the application could lead to these exceptions showing up where they didn't before, but at least they're an indication that something happened, rather than an incorrect result.
We should avoid retrying, or at least retrying forever, because if some operation always takes 100ms, and the profiler executes every 10ms, then it will keep interrupting the operation and the app will also get stuck.
Have you actually confirmed that readdir is returning
EINTR
?
I have! I have attached a pure-C reproducer, and when I run it with the gcsfuse folder I get:
$ gcc readdir-bug-repro.c -o readdir-bug-repro -lpthread && ./readdir-bug-repro fuse-testing/
Set up signal handler!
Received 113 signals, calling readdir...
Failed to read directory 'fuse-testing/': Interrupted system call
For reference, I'm running it on:
- Linux rubyshade 6.5.0-35-generic #35~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue May 7 09:00:52 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
- Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
- gcc version 11.4.0 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04)
If so, it could be a bug in the OS. However, if such a bug exists in major platforms, it may be unavoidable for Ruby to handle it.
This is a good question. I'll be honest that I could never reproduce with a local filesystem. I'm not sure if this just means that some filesystems (perhaps those implemented with FUSE?) allow this kind of failure, or if it's just really hard to hit it when there's kernel cache and all those things making sure these calls are very speedy.
Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 6 months ago
If it returns EINTR, then we should retry, because that's already the behavior for all other blocking syscalls like read(2)
, etc.
Is the SIGPROF handler installed with sigaction() without the SA_RESTART
flag?
Does it still happen if the SA_RESTART
is passed to sigaction()
? If yes it sounds like a possible bug of gcsfuse.
I suppose it can make sense the SIGPROF handler does not pass SA_RESTART
to be able to profile during blocking syscalls.
But depending on the method of profiling it might be unnecessary to interrupt syscalls, in which case it would be better to pass SA_RESTART
.
But in any case we should retry in CRuby, because for instance SIGVTALRM, used internally, on purpose interrupts syscalls.
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 6 months ago
I don't think it's a good idea to retry readdir
blindly.
It is probably that the FUSE driver throws EINTR when communicating, but it is not clear what kind of processing is done before and after the communication. It is possible that the internal state is inconsistent after readdir returns EINTR.
Then, should we rewinddir and try again? Or do we need to closedir and opendir again?
I don't think this is a problem we should deal with in our imagination. If we are serious about this problem, we should start by reporting the problem to the Linux kernel and asking them to clarify the behavior on their manpage.
As for Ruby, I think it is good to raise an exception by rb_sys_fail
for the time being.
And as for SIGPROF, it would be easy to set SA_RESTART. In fact, venier seems to set it.
Updated by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) 6 months ago
Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote in #note-4:
Is the SIGPROF handler installed with sigaction() without the
SA_RESTART
flag?
Does it still happen if theSA_RESTART
is passed tosigaction()
? If yes it sounds like a possible bug of gcsfuse.
Unfortunately the semantics aren't as simple as that :/
Both the reproducer I shared above as well readdir-bug-repro.c
as well as the Datadog Ruby profiler set SA_RESTART
when adding the signal handler.
The man page has a section mentioning some system calls are not restarted, regardless of the flag.
The following interfaces are never restarted after being interrupted by a signal handler, regardless of the use of SA_RESTART; they always fail with the error EINTR when interrupted by a signal handler: (...)
readdir
is not mentioned in this section, but it's also not mentioned in the section about calls that are restarted. So it's in a weird limbo.
mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote in #note-5:
It is probably that the FUSE driver throws EINTR when communicating, but it is not clear what kind of processing is done before and after the communication. It is possible that the internal state is inconsistent after readdir returns EINTR.
Then, should we rewinddir and try again? Or do we need to closedir and opendir again?
I don't think this is a problem we should deal with in our imagination. If we are serious about this problem, we should start by reporting the problem to the Linux kernel and asking them to clarify the behavior on their manpage.
Yeah -- I suspect the kernel/FUSE should hide a lot of these, otherwise most userland apps will get it wrong, but on the docs I could find it's not clear this behavior is entirely expected.
As for Ruby, I think it is good to raise an exception by
rb_sys_fail
for the time being.
This is my thinking as well -- if this does turn out to be a linux/FUSE/etc bug, it'll probably take a long time to roll out the fix so having Ruby do the right thing in the face of the weird issue is probably worth it?
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) 4 months ago
I've submitted a pull request that I hope will address most of these issues: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/11393
It adds error checking for readdir
, telldir
, and closedir
calls in dir.c
.
The closedir
check caught an actual bug exposed in Ruby's test suite, where a legitimate EBADF
error returned by closedir
would be ignored.
ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) wrote:
I've spent quite some time looking at the
dir.c
sources, and here's the full list of APIs that suffer from issues:
dir_each_entry
does not checkerrno
; all of its users have interruption bugs
Fixed by adding readdir
error checking.
dir_tell
will return -1 instead of the correct position (which means that passing -1 todir_seek
/dir_set_pos
will cause it to not list the directory properly)
Fixed by adding telldir
error checking.
do_opendir
an error in system calls will only sometimes be turned into a raised exception
- Indirect callers that pass in rb_glob_error as errfunc: rb_glob, Dir.[], Dir.glob
- Indirect callers that pass in 0 as errfunc: ruby_glob, ruby_brace_glob
This appears to be by design, ruby_glob
documentation states: "Identical to rb_glob(), except it returns opaque exception states instead of raising exceptions.", and ruby_brace_glob
documentation states "Identical to ruby_glob()". Neither ruby_glob
nor ruby_brace_glob
are used internally, they are only for use by extensions.
glob_opendir
does not check errno; all of its users have interruption bugsglob_getent
does not check errno; all of its users have interruption bugsnogvl_dir_empty_p
does not check errno (of readdir! it actually checks for opendir); all of its users have interruption bugs
Fixed by adding readdir
error checking.
Less sure about these:
do_stat
/do_lstat
will turn errors into warnings (unclear if enabled or disabled by default)
Use of sys_warning
happens in many other places for similar reasons (also in do_opendir
), so I don't think we should make changes just for those functions. These are verbose-mode only warnings.
need_normalization
callsfgetattrlist
/getattrlist
and all errors(ret != 0)
are treated in the same way
If an error occurs, that is currently treated as not needing normalization, which seems reasonable. One of the errors it can raise is ENOTSUP, indicating getattrlist is not supported, which can be taken as not needing normalization, since I think volumes that require normalization have support for getattrlist. Even if other cases, if there is a problem with the operation, it will occur later when the non-normalized file path is used.
rb_glob_error
is andrb_glob_caller
leave exceptions as pending and rely on callers to raise them properly
I doubt errors can be raised properly the way the functions are designed. The use of rb_protect
means you only know whether there was an exception raised, not anything about the exception.
- Error handling of
rb_home_dir_of
andrb_default_home_dir
are a bit suspicious
rb_home_dir_of
I have switching to use rb_getpwdirnam_for_login
in pull request 11202, and that function has proper error checks. rb_default_home_dir
calls rb_getpwdirnam_for_login
, rb_getlogin
, and rb_getpwdiruid
. Can you let me know what part of rb_default_home_dir
still looks suspicious?
Updated by Anonymous 4 months ago ยท Edited
On 2024-08-16 21:59:04, "jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) via ruby-core" ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org spake thus:
Issue #20586 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).
I've submitted a pull request that I hope will address most of these issues: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/11393
[...]ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) wrote:
I've spent quite some time looking at the
dir.c
sources, and here's the full list of APIs that suffer from issues:
[...]
Less sure about these:
[...]
- Error handling of
rb_home_dir_of
andrb_default_home_dir
are a bit suspicious
rb_home_dir_of
I have switching to userb_getpwdirnam_for_login
in pull request 11202, and that function has proper error checks.rb_default_home_dir
callsrb_getpwdirnam_for_login
,rb_getlogin
, andrb_getpwdiruid
. Can you let me know what part ofrb_default_home_dir
still looks suspicious?
[...]
rb_getpwdirnam_for_login
currently does not have any explicit
handling for EINTR
. However, it /is/ being treated as an
error[0][1], so should never result in a false negative ("no record
found for the supplied login_name").
I think it could be made to retry on EINTR
, so signals such as
SIGPROF
triggering EINTR
would not result in unnecessary
errors. An untested patch for this is included below.
Thanks,
-Al
[0] the same as if EIO
, ENOMEM
, EMFILE
, or ENFILE
[1] Calls to either getpwnam_r
or getpwnam
that result in errno
set to EINTR
result in rb_syserr_fail(...)
.
diff --git a/process.c b/process.c
index b1f9931f06..a71951d496 100644
--- a/process.c
+++ b/process.c
@@ -5827,8 +5827,13 @@ rb_getpwdirnam_for_login(VALUE login_name)
rb_str_set_len(getpwnm_tmp, bufsizenm);
int enm;
+ again1:
errno = 0;
while ((enm = getpwnam_r(login, &pwdnm, bufnm, bufsizenm, &pwptr)) != 0) {
+ if (enm == EINTR) {
+ /* call was interrupted, e.g., by SIGPROF or similar */
+ goto again1;
+ }
if (enm == ENOENT || enm== ESRCH || enm == EBADF || enm == EPERM) {
/* not found; non-errors */
@@ -5859,16 +5864,23 @@ rb_getpwdirnam_for_login(VALUE login_name)
# elif USE_GETPWNAM
+ again2:
errno = 0;
pwptr = getpwnam(login);
if (pwptr) {
/* found it */
return rb_str_new_cstr(pwptr->pw_dir);
}
- if (errno
+ if (errno) {
+ if (errno == EINTR) {
+ /* call was interrupted, e.g., by SIGPROF or similar */
+ goto again2;
+ }
+
/* avoid treating as errors errno values that indicate "not found" */
- && ( errno != ENOENT && errno != ESRCH && errno != EBADF && errno != EPERM)) {
- rb_syserr_fail(errno, "getpwnam");
+ if ( errno != ENOENT && errno != ESRCH && errno != EBADF && errno != EPERM) {
+ rb_syserr_fail(errno, "getpwnam");
+ }
}
return Qnil; /* not found */
--
a l a n d. s a l e w s k i
ads@salewski.email
salewski@att.net
https://github.com/salewski
Updated by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) 4 months ago
Hey! As usual thanks for picking up these thorny bugs :)
The fix looks good! In particular I've re-tested it with a modified version of the Datadog profiler where I force it to interrupt threads without GVL (the bug is very hard to trigger since https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20587 was fixed) and I can confirm I see the error showing up correctly now:
$ DD_PROFILING_ENABLED=true DD_PROFILING_DIR_INTERRUPTION_WORKAROUND_ENABLED=false bundle exec ddprofrb exec ruby -e "Datadog::Profiling.wait_until_running; pp Dir.children('fuse-testing/')"
-e:1:in 'Dir.children': Interrupted system call - readdir (Errno::EINTR)
from -e:1:in '<main>'
rb_home_dir_of I have switching to use rb_getpwdirnam_for_login in pull request 11202, and that function has proper error checks. rb_default_home_dir calls rb_getpwdirnam_for_login, rb_getlogin, and rb_getpwdiruid. Can you let me know what part of rb_default_home_dir still looks suspicious?
I've re-checked these, and between 11202 + me looking closer at some details and realizing they're correct I think it's mostly correct.
The only (potential?) issue I still see is with calls to getlogin
-- that one seems to bottom out on a number of IO reads and whatnot so it does look like it may end up with an EINTR. Even with 11202, rb_home_dir_of
is still calling getlogin
directly and without error checking.
I also noticed that ext/etc/etc.c
and ext/pty/pty.c
seem to also use getlogin
directly, so perhaps they'll also suffer from the same issue? ๐ค
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) 4 months ago
Anonymous wrote in #note-8:
rb_getpwdirnam_for_login
currently does not have any explicit
handling forEINTR
. However, it /is/ being treated as an
error[0][1], so should never result in a false negative ("no record
found for the supplied login_name").I think it could be made to retry on
EINTR
, so signals such as
SIGPROF
triggeringEINTR
would not result in unnecessary
errors. An untested patch for this is included below.
I think this is expected. The consensus seems to be that we should raise an error. Maybe we could change the handling to retry certain calls in the future, though. Maybe getpwnam
is safe, but I'm not positive it is in all cases. It doesn't seem to have the same issues as readdir
, but if the call does take a substantial amount of time, I could see it continually failing if SIGPROF interval is shorter than system call time.
ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) wrote in #note-9:
The only (potential?) issue I still see is with calls to
getlogin
-- that one seems to bottom out on a number of IO reads and whatnot so it does look like it may end up with an EINTR. Even with 11202,rb_home_dir_of
is still callinggetlogin
directly and without error checking.I also noticed that
ext/etc/etc.c
andext/pty/pty.c
seem to also usegetlogin
directly, so perhaps they'll also suffer from the same issue? ๐ค
That's a good point. I decided not to release GVL for getlogin
, as I don't think it should block as it should not need to access the file system, just memory. However, I agree that we should still add error checking. Maybe I can do that in a separate pull request.
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) 4 months ago
jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote in #note-10:
ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) wrote in #note-9:
The only (potential?) issue I still see is with calls to
getlogin
-- that one seems to bottom out on a number of IO reads and whatnot so it does look like it may end up with an EINTR. Even with 11202,rb_home_dir_of
is still callinggetlogin
directly and without error checking.I also noticed that
ext/etc/etc.c
andext/pty/pty.c
seem to also usegetlogin
directly, so perhaps they'll also suffer from the same issue? ๐คThat's a good point. I decided not to release GVL for
getlogin
, as I don't think it should block as it should not need to access the file system, just memory. However, I agree that we should still add error checking. Maybe I can do that in a separate pull request.
I've submitted a pull request to add error checking to getlogin
to rb_home_dir_of
and PTY.spawn
: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/11427
I reviewed getlogin
usage in etc
and it already handles errors, falling back to USER
environment variable:
login = getlogin();
if (!login) login = getenv("USER");
Updated by ivoanjo (Ivo Anjo) 4 months ago
jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote in #note-11:
I've submitted a pull request to add error checking to
getlogin
torb_home_dir_of
andPTY.spawn
: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/11427I reviewed
getlogin
usage inetc
and it already handles errors, falling back toUSER
environment variable:login = getlogin(); if (!login) login = getenv("USER");
๐๐๐
The "what's the worst thing that can happen" spidy sense makes me think that automatically falling back on errors that could be transient could mean that such calls have the potential to behave differently once-in-a-blue-moon (e.g. when the fallback kicks in).
On the other hand raising on error can mean failure on non-transient errors (and which ones are transient or not??) as well as rare exceptions being raised once-in-a-blue-moon, which does not seem very nice either, so I think the current version is reasonable.
Updated by jeremyevans (Jeremy Evans) 3 months ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Applied in changeset git|f2919bd11c570fc5f5440d1f101be38f61e3d16b.
Add error checking to readdir, telldir, and closedir calls in dir.c
Raise SystemCallError exception when these functions return an error.
This changes behavior for the following case (found by the tests):
dir1 = Dir.new('..')
dir2 = Dir.for_fd(dir1.fileno)
dir1.close
dir2.close
The above code is basically broken, as dir1.close
closed the file
descriptor. The subsequent dir2.close
call is undefined behavior.
When run in isolation, it raises Errno::EBADF after the change, but
if another thread opens a file descriptor between the dir1.close
and dir2.close
calls, the dir2.close
call could close the file
descriptor opened by the other thread. Raising an exception is much
better in this case as it makes it obvious there is a bug in the code.
For the readdir check, since the GVL has already been released,
reacquire it rb_thread_call_with_gvl if an exception needs to be
raised.
Due to the number of closedir calls, this adds static close_dir_data
and check_closedir functions. The close_dir_data takes a
struct dir_data * and handles setting the dir entry to NULL regardless
of failure.
Fixes [Bug #20586]
Co-authored-by: Nobuyoshi Nakada nobu.nakada@gmail.com