Feature #19194
closed
Added by make_now_just (Hiroya Fujinami) almost 2 years ago.
Updated almost 2 years ago.
Description
I suggest adding a new method named Regexp.linear_time?
to check if matching against a given regexp can be completed in linear time by the optimization introduced in #19104 (GitHub PR #6486).
This method was discussed in #19104. I'm not sure the name is best.
Example¶
Regexp.linear_time?(/a/) # => true
Regexp.linear_time?(/(a|a)*\1/) # => false, because this uses a back-reference.
# This can accept a regexp source string and flags like `Regexp.new`.
Regexp.linear_time?('a') # => true
Regexp.linear_time?('a', Regexp::IGNORECASE) # => true
For example, this method is useful for implementing a Rubocop rule to check a regexp is ReDoS safe.
Implementation¶
Implementation is done at GitHub PR #6901.
See the details there.
@make_now just Thank you!
I would like to propose @make_now_just (Hiroya Fujinami) as a committer. He has made a great improvement to the Regexp engine. Ruby's Regexp engine is in a state of its own fork from onigmo, and he is a valuable person who can maintain it. @matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) What do you think?
Note: I have spoken directly with @make_now_just (Hiroya Fujinami) and he has agreed with my proposal to a committer, and I am proposing it.
Also accepted to nominate him a committer.
Matz.
- Target version set to 3.2
Thank you for accepting the change and nominating me to a committer. I welcome this nomination.
- Status changed from Open to Assigned
- Assignee set to make_now_just (Hiroya Fujinami)
May I merge the pull request on GitHub?
Yes, you can merge it. I meant commit and push to master branch directly or merge pull-request.
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
I feel it would be more natural if it was defined as instance method:
/a/.linear_time?
Regexp.new('a').linear_time?
Is there any reason for class method?
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Like1
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like1