Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #7819

closed

configure script doesn't recognize valid options

Added by telemachus (Peter Aronoff) about 11 years ago. Updated about 11 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Assignee:
-
Target version:
ruby -v:
ruby 1.9.3p385 (2013-02-06 revision 39114) [x86_64-darwin12.2.0]
Backport:
[ruby-core:52082]

Description

When configuring the latest version of Ruby, the configure script issues warnings about "unrecognized" but valid (?) build options.

To reproduce:

  1. Untar the 1.9.3-p385.tar.gz

  2. Give the following options to the configure script:

    ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/ruby-1.9.3-p385
    --with-openssl-dir=/usr/local
    --with-readline-dir=/usr/local
    --with-yaml-dir=/usr/local
    --with-gdbm-dir=/usr/local
    --with-libffi-dir=/usr/local

The result is this warning, both at the top and the bottom of the configuration output:

configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-openssl-dir, --with-readline-dir, --with-yaml-dir, --with-gdbm-dir, --with-libffi-dir

Based on discussion in irc and the results of the build, I think that the warnings are bogus. That is, those options are recognized and used in the build.

Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 11 years ago

  • Subject changed from configure script doesn't recognize valid options to configure script doesn't recognize valid options
  • Status changed from Open to Closed

You're right, it's just a warning.
Or, just use only --with-opt-dir=/usr/local instead.

Updated by Wonbyte (Greg Sieranski) about 11 years ago

So the --with options are correct to use? Even with Ruby-2.0.0-p0?

Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) about 11 years ago

Wonbyte (Greg Sieranski) wrote:

So the --with options are correct to use? Even with Ruby-2.0.0-p0?

Yes, it is correct.
Why it shows such warnings is configure itself actually ignores them, but later build process use them.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like0
Like0Like0Like0