Feature #5505
closed
Added by trans (Thomas Sawyer) about 13 years ago.
Updated about 13 years ago.
Description
Unless there is already some way to do it that I've overlooked, the it would be nice if there were still some way to extend an instance of BasicObject.
Probably the easiest way is defining #extend.
Try Kernel.send(:extend_object, BasicObject.new)
- Status changed from Open to Rejected
o = BasicObject.new
class <<o
include Enumerable
end
should work.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto matz@ruby-lang.orgwrote:
o = BasicObject.new
class <<o
include Enumerable
end
should work.
It doesn't, but this does:
o = BasicObject.new
class <<o
include ::Enumerable
end
Ah, right I forgot about this... what do you call it? The "callback"?
It needs to be:
Enumerable.send(:extend_object, BasicObject.new)
but it worked.
@matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) thanks that will work too --although with a little more meta-programming if the module was in a variable.
Thanks. Sorry for the noise. Should have put the question on ruby-talk instead... but there so little communication actually going on there these days.
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0