Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #21293

open

C23/GCC 15 build breakage with rb_define_method() and friends

Added by alanwu (Alan Wu) 7 days ago. Updated 5 days ago.

Status:
Open
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
[ruby-core:121769]

Description

GCC 15 defaults to -std=gnu23, which breaks rb_define_method() in some corner cases:

diff --git a/object.c b/object.c
index 5a379e9..958f421 100644
--- a/object.c
+++ b/object.c
@@ -4613,7 +4613,8 @@ InitVM_Object(void)
     rb_cFalseClass = rb_define_class("FalseClass", rb_cObject);
     rb_cFalseClass_to_s = rb_fstring_enc_lit("false", rb_usascii_encoding());
     rb_vm_register_global_object(rb_cFalseClass_to_s);
-    rb_define_method(rb_cFalseClass, "to_s", rb_false_to_s, 0);
+    int zero = 0;
+    rb_define_method(rb_cFalseClass, "to_s", rb_false_to_s, zero);
     rb_define_alias(rb_cFalseClass, "inspect", "to_s");
     rb_define_method(rb_cFalseClass, "&", false_and, 1);
     rb_define_method(rb_cFalseClass, "|", false_or, 1);

Applying the above is fine prior to C23, but on GCC 15 it triggers a build error:

compiling object.c
In file included from ./include/ruby/ruby.h:27,
                 from constant.h:13,
                 from object.c:22:
object.c: In function 'InitVM_Object':
./include/ruby/internal/anyargs.h:288:135: error: passing argument 3 of 'rb_define_method_m3' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  288 | #define rb_define_method(klass, mid, func, arity)           RBIMPL_ANYARGS_DISPATCH_rb_define_method((arity), (func))((klass), (mid), (func), (arity))
      |                                                                                                                                       ^~~~~~
      |                                                                                                                                       |
      |                                                                                                                                       VALUE (*)(VALUE) {aka long unsigned int (*)(long unsigned int)}
object.c:4617:5: note: in expansion of macro 'rb_define_method'
 4617 |     rb_define_method(rb_cFalseClass, "to_s", rb_false_to_s, kek);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/ruby/internal/anyargs.h:277:21: note: expected 'VALUE (*)(void)' {aka 'long unsigned int (*)(void)'} but argument is of type 'VALUE (*)(VALUE)' {aka 'long unsigned int (*)(long unsigned int)'}
  277 | RBIMPL_ANYARGS_DECL(rb_define_method, VALUE, const char *)
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/ruby/internal/anyargs.h:252:41: note: in definition of macro 'RBIMPL_ANYARGS_DECL'
  252 | RBIMPL_ANYARGS_ATTRSET(sym) static void sym ## _m3(__VA_ARGS__, VALUE(*)(ANYARGS), int); \
      |                                         ^~~
object.c:1605:1: note: 'rb_false_to_s' declared here
 1605 | rb_false_to_s(VALUE obj)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
At top level:
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-self-assign' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-parentheses-equality' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-constant-logical-operand' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
make: *** [Makefile:464: object.o] Error 1

This also happens for C method that takes a large number of arguments.

This is because in C23 void foo(); no longers means "foo takes an unspecified number of arguments", and there is no way to implement a working ANYARGS AFAIK.

Not something people would run into in practice, I hope.

(related: #21286 but this one is not Windows specific)


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to Ruby - Bug #21286: Windows - MSYS2 just updated to GCC 15.1.0, builds failingClosedActions
Actions #1

Updated by alanwu (Alan Wu) 7 days ago

  • Related to Bug #21286: Windows - MSYS2 just updated to GCC 15.1.0, builds failing added
Actions #2

Updated by alanwu (Alan Wu) 7 days ago

  • Description updated (diff)

Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) 5 days ago

Yes... This is a macro expansion glitch.

Basically if zero was an integer constant expression (which it isn't, by the way, in your diff), __buiitin_constant_p in this line would be true, and rb_define_method macro would be expanded as expected. This normally works because a C function tends to have compile-time fixed arity. People do not need to pass dynamic value here. But if they do... It breaks, like you reported.

rb_define_method is a rusty API. Its design dates back to when matz still used K&R C. C evolved since then. We have coped with the language updates but are having hard times recently. Maybe either we want a "modern" C API, or we want to stop following the C standard (which many projects do anyway).

Actions #4

Updated by alanwu (Alan Wu) 5 days ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0