Feature #20692
openRewrite Array#bsearch in Ruby
Description
inspired by https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20182
Proporsal¶
Rewrite Array#bsearch
class Array
def bsearch
return to_enum(:bsearch) { size } unless block_given?
return nil if empty?
low = 0
high = size - 1
mid = size / 2
case yield(self[low])
when true, false
while low < high
if yield(self[mid])
high = mid
else
low = mid + 1
end
mid = low + (high - low) / 2
end
yield(self[low]) ? self[low] : nil
else
# Find-any mode
while low <= high
case yield(self[mid])
when 0
return self[mid]
when 1
high = mid - 1
when -1
low = mid + 1
else
raise TypeError, 'wrong argument type (must be -1, 0, 1, true, or false)'
end
mid = low + (high - low) / 2
end
nil
end
end
end
https://github.com/sebyx07/native_ruby/blob/master/lib/native_ruby/array/bsearch.rb
I also created this gem:
https://github.com/sebyx07/native_ruby/ - to load patches w/o depending on the ruby/master
Benchmark¶
ruby 3.3.3 (2024-06-12 revision f1c7b6f435) +YJIT [x86_64-linux]
Benchmark results sorted array (average over 10000000 iterations):
user system total real
Original bsearch: 11.499511 0.000000 11.499511 ( 11.500056)
Native bsearch: 2.923645 0.003860 2.927505 ( 2.927539)
Benchmark results shuffled (average over 10000000 iterations):
user system total real
Original bsearch: 8.726749 0.000001 8.726750 ( 8.727679)
Native bsearch: 3.073027 0.000006 3.073033 ( 3.073231)
Updated by Hanmac (Hans Mackowiak) 3 months ago
find_minimum_mode = finder || !finder
isn't this always true?
Updated by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) 3 months ago
I think this is a good idea, but I think we need to make a few changes. First, to_enum
and block_given?
are both method calls. It's possible for people to monkey patch Array and add those methods, but the original implementation of Array#bsearch
would ignore such monkey patches. To maintain existing behavior, we must use code that doesn't depend on those methods the same way the Array#each implementation works.
Additionally, I think this proposal has the same problem as the initial version of the Array#each
implementation in Ruby, specifically a possible thread safety problem between the <
comparison at the []
fetch. I think we can address that by doing the same trick as Array#each
.
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 3 months ago
I tried make test-all TESTS=test/ruby/test_array.rb
with the proposed implementation, but several tests failed. They should be solved before discussing performance.
[ 47/447] TestArray#test_bsearch_in_find_any_mode = 0.00 s
1) Error:
TestArray#test_bsearch_in_find_any_mode:
TypeError: wrong argument type (must be -1, 0, 1, true, or false)
<internal:array>:245:in 'Array#bsearch'
/home/mame/work/ruby/test/ruby/test_array.rb:3360:in 'TestArray#test_bsearch_in_find_any_mode'
[174/447] TestArray#test_bsearch_typechecks_return_values = 0.00 s
2) Failure:
TestArray#test_bsearch_typechecks_return_values [/home/mame/work/ruby/test/ruby/test_array.rb:3337]:
Expected Exception(TypeError) was raised, but the message doesn't match.
Expected /C\u{309a 26a1 26c4 1f300}/ to match "wrong argument type (must be -1, 0, 1, true, or false)".
[198/447] TestArray#test_bsearch_with_no_block = 0.00 s
3) Failure:
TestArray#test_bsearch_with_no_block [/home/mame/work/ruby/test/ruby/test_array.rb:3345]:
Expected 5 to be nil.
[269/447] TestArraySubclass#test_bsearch_in_find_any_mode = 0.00 s
4) Error:
TestArraySubclass#test_bsearch_in_find_any_mode:
TypeError: wrong argument type (must be -1, 0, 1, true, or false)
<internal:array>:245:in 'Array#bsearch'
/home/mame/work/ruby/test/ruby/test_array.rb:3360:in 'TestArray#test_bsearch_in_find_any_mode'
[396/447] TestArraySubclass#test_bsearch_typechecks_return_values = 0.00 s
5) Failure:
TestArraySubclass#test_bsearch_typechecks_return_values [/home/mame/work/ruby/test/ruby/test_array.rb:3337]:
Expected Exception(TypeError) was raised, but the message doesn't match.
Expected /C\u{309a 26a1 26c4 1f300}/ to match "wrong argument type (must be -1, 0, 1, true, or false)".
[420/447] TestArraySubclass#test_bsearch_with_no_block = 0.00 s
6) Failure:
TestArraySubclass#test_bsearch_with_no_block [/home/mame/work/ruby/test/ruby/test_array.rb:3345]:
Expected 5 to be nil.
I am also concerned about the performance when YJIT is not enabled.