Feature #18585
closedPromote find pattern to official feature
Description
"Find pattern" has introduced in 3.0 and it is still marked as an experimental.
I don't see any problems, so it is time to promote it to official feature.
(BTW, it was useful when writing code like the following for a practical example.)
if ary in [*, {a: 0, b: 1 | 2} => i, *]
...
end
Updated by retro (Josef Šimánek) over 2 years ago
Hello! Is this request related to the whole feature (as described at https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.1/doc/syntax/pattern_matching_rdoc.html) or only to one pattern called "Find pattern" (as described at https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.1/doc/syntax/pattern_matching_rdoc.html#label-Patterns)?
Updated by ktsj (Kazuki Tsujimoto) over 2 years ago
Is this request related to the whole feature (as described at https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.1/doc/syntax/pattern_matching_rdoc.html) or only to one pattern called "Find pattern" (as described at https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.1/doc/syntax/pattern_matching_rdoc.html#label-Patterns)?
There is no difference between the two.
Except find pattern, pattern matching is already official feature.
Updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) over 2 years ago
Accepted. Congratulations.
Matz.
Updated by retro (Josef Šimánek) over 2 years ago
ktsj (Kazuki Tsujimoto) wrote in #note-2:
Is this request related to the whole feature (as described at https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.1/doc/syntax/pattern_matching_rdoc.html) or only to one pattern called "Find pattern" (as described at https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.1/doc/syntax/pattern_matching_rdoc.html#label-Patterns)?
There is no difference between the two.
Except find pattern, pattern matching is already official feature.
Thanks for the info.
matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote in #note-3:
Accepted. Congratulations.
Matz.
Would be PR welcomed for this change?
Updated by ktsj (Kazuki Tsujimoto) over 2 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
Applied in changeset git|db6b23c76cbc7888cd9a9912790c2068703afdd0.
Find pattern is no longer experimental [Feature #18585]
Updated by ktsj (Kazuki Tsujimoto) over 2 years ago
retro (Josef Šimánek) wrote in #note-4:
Would be PR welcomed for this change?
I've already merged the patch. Thanks.