Bug #18424
closed
- Status changed from Open to Rejected
The Ruby package itself does not depend on log4j. For an application or library written in Ruby, please ask to its maintainer.
Yes, that's correct. The naming in these test cases is inspired by realworld packages, but these are just dummy packages just for the sake of testing, not the real library code. You can replace log4j
with very-secure-library
in those tests and they should still pass.
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0