Feature #16104
openIntroduce merge_if and merge_if!
Description
The method merge_if
/ merge_if
will merge the passed hash in parameter only if the block evaluates to true, otherwise not. Similar to count
method with a block.
Updated by akash (Akash Gupta) over 5 years ago
akash (Akash Gupta) wrote:
The method
merge_if
/merge_if!
will merge the passed hash in parameter only if the block evaluates to true, otherwise not. Similar tocount
method with a block.
For ex:
a = {a: 'Apple'}
a.merge_if(b: 'Ball') {|k, v| v == 'Apple'}
=> {a: 'Apple', b: 'Ball'}
Updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler) over 5 years ago
Hmmm. I have mixed feelings about it. I think being able to add something
into e. g. a Hash, based on a conditional inside of the method, may be useful.
We also have at the least one example of "_if", such as for Array:
.delete_if
Where (I think) this may be equal to Array#reject!.
There is no .delete_if! though, so perhaps this may apply to your feature
request too.
On the other hand ... visually I am not entirely sure whether this is
quite elegant, although this is highly subjective.
Consider:
if foobar
barfoo.merge_if(b: 'Ball') {|k, v| v == 'Apple'}
end unless blub
This is of course contrived, but the part I am unsure is whether we should
have more NAME_if methods as such. I can not say whether I am completely
against it, but I am a bit wary of such method names that include conditionals
in the name itself.
I think most ruby names tend to be one word; a few are two words.
(If anyone knows of more methods that have "_if" as part of their names,
in core/stdlib, please feel free to add to the list - I really do not know
of more examples off the top of my head.)
PS: On a side note, I never manage to remember the difference between .merge()
.merge!() and .update() off-hand - I always try in irb first; I only know one
is an alias ... :D
Updated by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada) over 5 years ago
Do
a.each_with_object(b: 'Ball') {|(k, v), h| h[k] = v if v == 'Apple'}
or
{b: 'Ball'}.merge(a.select{|k, v| v == 'Apple'})
Updated by janfri (Jan Friedrich) over 5 years ago
akash (Akash Gupta) wrote:
The method
merge_if
/merge_if!
will merge the passed hash in parameter only if the block evaluates to true, otherwise not. Similar tocount
method with a block.
What if the callee has more than one entry? For example
a = {a: 'Apple', c: 'Pear'}
a.merge_if(b: 'Ball') {|k, v| v == 'Apple'}
# => ???
The block is called twice and evaluates one time to true
and the other time to false
.