Bug #12071
closedGem installation fails with 2.3.0 on Cygwin
Description
Hello,
I would like report an issue when installing gem on Cygwin with ruby 2.3.0.
Backtrace is:
/home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require': cannot load such file -- win32/resolv (LoadError)
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/2.3.0/resolv.rb:971:in `default_config_hash'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/2.3.0/resolv.rb:989:in `block in lazy_initialize'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/2.3.0/resolv.rb:982:in `synchronize'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/2.3.0/resolv.rb:982:in `lazy_initialize'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/2.3.0/resolv.rb:360:in `block in lazy_initialize'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/2.3.0/resolv.rb:358:in `synchronize'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/2.3.0/resolv.rb:358:in `lazy_initialize'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/2.3.0/resolv.rb:518:in `fetch_resource'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/2.3.0/resolv.rb:512:in `each_resource'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/2.3.0/resolv.rb:493:in `getresource'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/remote_fetcher.rb:99:in `api_endpoint'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/source.rb:47:in `api_uri'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/source.rb:183:in `load_specs'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/spec_fetcher.rb:263:in `tuples_for'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/spec_fetcher.rb:238:in `block in available_specs'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/source_list.rb:98:in `each'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/source_list.rb:98:in `each_source'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/spec_fetcher.rb:223:in `available_specs'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/spec_fetcher.rb:103:in `search_for_dependency'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/commands/update_command.rb:118:in `fetch_remote_gems'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/commands/update_command.rb:140:in `highest_remote_version'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/commands/update_command.rb:268:in `block in which_to_update'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/commands/update_command.rb:264:in `each'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/commands/update_command.rb:264:in `which_to_update'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/commands/update_command.rb:97:in `execute'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/command.rb:308:in `invoke_with_build_args'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/command_manager.rb:169:in `process_args'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/command_manager.rb:139:in `run'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/gem_runner.rb:55:in `run'
from /home/USER/.rbenv/versions/2.3.0/bin/gem:21:in `<main>'
I fixed the issue with the attached patch, but I'm not sure if this is the correct way...
Files
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) almost 9 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Feedback
Since Cygwin does not have its own resolv.conf
file, it is not correct.
How did you install ruby, and did fiddle
get installed successfully?
Please show mkmf.log
files under ext/fiddle
and ext/win32
.
Updated by Panyamin (Benjamin Gueroult) almost 9 years ago
- File fiddle.mkmf.log fiddle.mkmf.log added
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
How did you install ruby, and did
fiddle
get installed successfully?
I installed with rbenv, and I'm pretty sure that it doesn't work with the "common way". I can test if you want?
Please show
mkmf.log
files underext/fiddle
andext/win32
.
You'll find fiddle mkmf.log
attached.
I found nothing in win32
. Which meaning compilator didn't even entered in it..?
Thanks !
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) almost 9 years ago
Does fiddle
get installed and work?
win32
requires it.
Updated by Panyamin (Benjamin Gueroult) almost 9 years ago
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Does
fiddle
get installed and work?
win32
requires it.
Well, I've found some snippets on using fiddle
, and it's working.
I guess during compilation ext/win32
dir isn't even entered.
Updated by Panyamin (Benjamin Gueroult) almost 9 years ago
Note that when compiling 2.2.4, win32
is entered because there is mkmf.log
.
Updated by Panyamin (Benjamin Gueroult) almost 9 years ago
- File config.log config.log added
- File ruby-build.20160218233708.3584.log ruby-build.20160218233708.3584.log added
If this can help you, here is the config.log
and build.log
from compilation.
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) almost 9 years ago
- Backport changed from 2.3: UNKNOWN to 2.3: REQUIRED
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) almost 9 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
Updated by Panyamin (Benjamin Gueroult) almost 9 years ago
Awesome, thank you!
Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) over 8 years ago
- Backport changed from 2.3: REQUIRED to 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: DONTNEED, 2.3: REQUIRED
Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) over 8 years ago
- Backport changed from 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: DONTNEED, 2.3: REQUIRED to 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: DONTNEED, 2.3: DONE
ruby_2_3 r54406 merged revision(s) 53868.
Updated by hedgehog (Hedge Hog) almost 8 years ago
This issue is also present in ruby 2.2.6. Should I open a new issue or does it suffice to note this here?
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) almost 8 years ago
- Backport changed from 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: DONTNEED, 2.3: DONE to 2.1: DONTNEED, 2.2: REQUIRED, 2.3: DONE
No, you don't have to open a new issue.
Changed Backport now.
Updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) almost 8 years ago
- Status changed from Closed to Feedback
Is this problem really present in ruby 2.2 ?
I've never backported default_exclude_exts
feature.
Updated by hedgehog (Hedge Hog) almost 8 years ago
Yes this issue is present in 2.2.6.
When I checked the logs I saw the same symptoms reported here.
When I checked the 2.2.6 source code on my local machine it appeared that change in revision 53868 was also required there in the 2.2.6 source:
https://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/ext/extmk.rb?r1=53448&r2=53868&pathrev=53868
Unfortunately I am on leave and don't have access to my windows machine.
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed