Bug #10595
closed
interrupts not handled while finalizers running
Added by normalperson (Eric Wong) about 10 years ago.
Updated about 10 years ago.
Description
Originally noted in [ruby-core:66635]
Trying to Ctrl-C something like the following loop is not always successful:
f = proc { 1000.times {} }
loop do
ObjectSpace.define_finalizer(Object.new, f)
end
The Interrupt is created and raised, but lost during the postponed
job processing (rb_postponed_job_flush).
Trying to mask out all interrupt flags (instead of just
th->interrupt_mask |= POSTPONED_JOB_INTERRUPT_MASK) allows the
interrupt to be handled, but this is not suitable for expensive
finalizers.
So I haven't figured out how to fix this, yet... Help appreciated, thanks.
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset r48829.
vm_trace.c: defer interrupts while postponed jobs
- vm_trace.c (rb_postponed_job_flush): mask signal trap interrupt
too to defer handling after finalizers finished.
[ruby-core:66825] [Bug #10595]
nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
vm_trace.c: defer interrupts while postponed jobs
- vm_trace.c (rb_postponed_job_flush): mask signal trap interrupt
too to defer handling after finalizers finished.
[ruby-core:66825] [Bug #10595]
Sorry, I tried something like this but it's not effective if the
finalizer has an expensive (or infinite) loop.
I suppose it's better than nothing and finalizers should not
be expensive...
Yes, but interruptions of finalizers could cause serious undesirable results.
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Like0
Like0Like0Like0