Ruby Issue Tracking System

02/07/2018

08:33 PM Ruby Bug #14456: Dir.glob with FNM_CASEFOLD gives ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in UTF-8

shevegen (Robert A. Heiler) wrote:
> Not sure if it can be removed, but I think you can change the status
> ...
Someone did, thanks!
> To the bug report, just out of curiosity, can you avoid the UTF
> ...
Yes: `Dir.glob('*a'.encode... Gondolin (Damien Robert)

02/06/2018

01:48 PM Ruby Bug #14456: Dir.glob with FNM_CASEFOLD gives ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in UTF-8

Apologies for the spam, my browser submitted this bug several times and I don't know how to erase the other bug reports. Gondolin (Damien Robert)

01:43 PM Ruby Bug #14456 (Closed): Dir.glob with FNM_CASEFOLD gives ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in UTF-8

With ruby 2.5.0p0, in a folder that contains a file encoded in latin-1, I get the following error:
~~~ ruby
Dir.glob('*a', File::FNM_CASEFOLD)
ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in UTF-8
~~~
Note that `Dir.glob('*', File::FNM_... Gondolin (Damien Robert)

01:42 PM Ruby Bug #14455 (Closed): Dir.glob with FNM_CASEFOLD gives ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in UTF-8

With ruby 2.5.0p0, in a folder that contains a file encoded in latin-1, I get the following error:
~~~ ruby
Dir.glob('*a', File::FNM_CASEFOLD)
ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in UTF-8
~~~
Note that `Dir.glob('*', File::FNM_... Gondolin (Damien Robert)

01:41 PM Ruby Bug #14454 (Closed): Dir.glob with FNM_CASEFOLD gives ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in UTF-8

With ruby 2.5.0p0, in a folder that contains a file encoded in latin-1, I get the following error:
~~~ ruby
Dir.glob('*a', File::FNM_CASEFOLD)
ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in UTF-8
~~~
Note that `Dir.glob('*', File::FNM_... Gondolin (Damien Robert)

03/24/2017

11:38 PM Ruby Bug #13236: Ruby segfault

nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) wrote:
> Could you enable debugging?
So I *think* I have managed to bisect the segfault. When I comment a specific test I never see the segfault, but when I uncomment it I get (sometimes) the segfault. The tes... Gondolin (Damien Robert)

03/16/2017

09:20 PM Ruby Bug #13271: Clarifications on refinement spec

shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote:
> The behavior was changed by Feature #8571.
Well I prefer that this feature remains so that's nice! But this probably means that the spec should be updated then? Gondolin (Damien Robert)

03/15/2017

08:30 AM Ruby Bug #13271: Clarifications on refinement spec

Thanks for the answers!
shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote:
> The behavior of my first proposal was what you expected, but it was changed to reduce implicit effects of refinements.
So should I expect that in future ruby versions `using M` ... Gondolin (Damien Robert)

03/02/2017

09:38 PM Ruby Bug #13271 (Closed): Clarifications on refinement spec

Consider the following code:
~~~ruby
class Foo
def foo
"Foo#foo"
end
def bar
"Foo#bar"
end
end
class Bar < Foo
def foo
"Bar#foo -> "+super
end
def bar
"Bar#bar -> "+super
end
end
modu... Gondolin (Damien Robert)

02/20/2017

05:20 PM Ruby Bug #13236: Ruby segfault

Damien Robert wrote:
> The code is in https://github.com/DamienRobert/drain
> ...
PS: I apologize that I was not able to get a minimal working example. I tried to do so in 'test_graph_segfault.rb' but it does not segfault. However remo... Gondolin (Damien Robert)