Misc #9128: Clarify documentation on difference between Object#clone and Object#dup

• Status: Closed
• Assignee: zzak (zzak _)

[stevegoobermanhill (stephen gooberman-hill)]

Object#clone and Object#dup documentation does not show that modules mixed in via Module#extend are preserved by #clone, but not by #dup

[drbrain (Eric Hodel)]

• Assignee changed from drbrain (Eric Hodel) to zzak (zzak _)

[zzak (zzak _)]

• Status changed from Open to Assigned

[zzak (zzak _)]

• Status changed from Assigned to Closed
• % Done changed from 0 to 100

This issue was solved with changeset r43747.
stephen, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.

---

• object.c: [DOC] Clarify Object#dup vs #clone [Bug #9128]
  Moving existing doc for this comparison to separate section of #dup
  Adding examples to document behavior of #dup with Module#extend.
  Based on a patch by stevegoobermanhill