Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #7271

closed

Refinement doesn't seem lexical

Added by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) about 12 years ago. Updated almost 12 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Target version:
ruby -v:
ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-01 trunk 37404) [i386-mswin32_100]
Backport:
[ruby-core:48820]

Description

C_User#y is refined. Is that intentional?

class C
def foo
p :C_foo
end
end

module RefineC
refine C do
def foo
p :RefineC_foo
super
end
end
end

class C_User
using RefineC
def x
C.new.foo
end
end

class C_User
def y
C.new.foo
end
end

C_User.new.x
C_User.new.y

#=>
:RefineC_foo
:C_foo
:RefineC_foo
:C_foo


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to Ruby master - Feature #4085: Refinements and nested methodsClosedshugo (Shugo Maeda)11/24/2010Actions

Updated by shugo (Shugo Maeda) almost 12 years ago

ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote:

C_User#y is refined. Is that intentional?

Yes, it's intentional. Refinements are activated when C_User is reopend.

I'm not sure whether is'a good idea or not, but if C_User.module_eval is affected by refinements, it seems natural reopened definitions of C_User are also affected.

Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) almost 12 years ago

(2012/11/05 11:57), shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote:

Yes, it's intentional. Refinements are activated when C_User is reopend.

I'm not sure whether is'a good idea or not, but if C_User.module_eval is affected by refinements, it seems natural reopened definitions of C_User are also affected.

I can't understand that refinement is "lexical" or not.

If it affected after re-open, then it is not "lexical".
If the location of `using' affect the result, then it seems "lexical".
([ruby-core:48773] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269])

--
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net

Updated by shugo (Shugo Maeda) almost 12 years ago

ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote:

(2012/11/05 11:57), shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote:

Yes, it's intentional. Refinements are activated when C_User is reopend.

I'm not sure whether is'a good idea or not, but if C_User.module_eval is affected by refinements, it seems natural reopened definitions of C_User are also affected.

I can't understand that refinement is "lexical" or not.

If it affected after re-open, then it is not "lexical".
If the location of `using' affect the result, then it seems "lexical".
([ruby-core:48773] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269])

I may have confused you by the word lexical, but I used the word lexical in the sense that refinements have no local rebinding. I'm not sure whether refinements should be literally lexical or not.

I guess if refinements are literally lexical it's good for performance, but how module_eval (or an alternative to apply refinements to a given block) should behave?

Updated by shugo (Shugo Maeda) almost 12 years ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to Closed

Refinements are not activated by reopen now, so I close this ticket.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0