Ruby Issue Tracking System

05/16/2026

12:24 AM Ruby Bug #22071: super in method in module that is refined results in NoMethodError

jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote in #note-3:
> ```diff
> ...
Thank you.
It seems reasonable except that `RCLASS_INCLUDER(me->defined_class)` is better than `((struct RClass_and_rb_classext_t*)me->defined_class)->classext.as.iclass.in... shugo (Shugo Maeda)

12:09 AM Ruby Bug #22058: {Method,InstanceMethod}#super_method doesn't work correctly for refined method with refinements for method active in the caller's scope

jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote in #note-10:
> @shugo Thank you, I think I finally understand. After the first refinement method is called, the caller's scope no longer matters, because each `super` call site considers the refinements... shugo (Shugo Maeda)

05/15/2026

04:50 AM Ruby Bug #22071 (Assigned): super in method in module that is refined results in NoMethodError

shugo (Shugo Maeda)

04:49 AM Ruby Bug #22071: super in method in module that is refined results in NoMethodError

Refinements for modules were initially prohibited, and were allowed in [Feature #12534] while `super` was still prohibited. Supporting `super` in a refinement for a module would go beyond a bug fix, so I think it should be discussed as a... shugo (Shugo Maeda)

02:38 AM Ruby Bug #22058: {Method,InstanceMethod}#super_method doesn't work correctly for refined method with refinements for method active in the caller's scope

jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote in #note-8:
> > > I think option 2 makes more sense, but it requires that Method/InstanceMethod objects for refined methods keep a reference to the scope in which they were created
> ...
`Kernel#method... shugo (Shugo Maeda)

05/14/2026

07:01 AM Ruby Bug #22058: {Method,InstanceMethod}#super_method doesn't work correctly for refined method with refinements for method active in the caller's scope

jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote:
> I think option 2 makes more sense, but it requires that Method/InstanceMethod objects for refined methods keep a reference to the scope in which they were created
Could you clarify what you mean by "... shugo (Shugo Maeda)

05/13/2026

08:34 AM Ruby Bug #22058: {Method,InstanceMethod}#super_method doesn't work correctly for refined method with refinements for method active in the caller's scope

matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote in #note-4:
> @shugo is right. The change in super's behavior in 2.7 was unintentional, so I'm in favor of fixing it to match the documentation.
I realized that completely ignoring refinements when sea... shugo (Shugo Maeda)

05:40 AM Ruby Bug #22058 (Assigned): {Method,InstanceMethod}#super_method doesn't work correctly for refined method with refinements for method active in the caller's scope

shugo (Shugo Maeda)

01:37 AM Ruby Bug #22058: {Method,InstanceMethod}#super_method doesn't work correctly for refined method with refinements for method active in the caller's scope

shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote in #note-2:
> FYI, I tried using rb_callable_method_entry_without_refinements() in method_super_method() to avoid the infinite loop, but it returns a wrong result in the following case:
Actually, I need to r... shugo (Shugo Maeda)

05/12/2026

08:50 AM Ruby Bug #22058: {Method,InstanceMethod}#super_method doesn't work correctly for refined method with refinements for method active in the caller's scope

jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote:
> These semantics seem questionable. My guess is they are not the result of intentional design, but due purely to implementation details. I see two possibilities:
> ...
Agreed.
FYI, I tried using r... shugo (Shugo Maeda)