Project

General

Profile

Bug #15733

Inconsistent __FILE__ and Kernel#__dir__

Added by tagomoris (Satoshi TAGOMORI) 3 months ago. Updated 13 days ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
[ruby-core:92028]

Description

This might be duplicated with #7975, #8098 and #3346, but I believe it's worth to revisit.

Now, Ruby has __FILE__ keyword and Kernel#__dir__ method. One is of upper-case chars, and the other is of lower-case chars.
I make mistakes always when I want to get the directory name of the current file, to write __DIR__ (of course, it doesn't exist).
That is because of inconsistency between __FILE__ and __dir__.

I understood the reason why __dir__ is of lower-case chars (to show it's defined as a method, not keyword), but this inconsistency brings huge confusion to me.
So, in my opinion, Ruby should have one of these options below:

  • keyword __DIR__
  • method alias Kernel#__DIR__ (as a compromise, but are there any difference between keyword __DIR__ and Kernel#__DIR__?)
  • method Kernel#__file__ (we don't take care of method overheads when we access file systems)

History

Updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler) 3 months ago

I have no personal preference here either way but I can also understand Satoshi's
explanation / confusion.

This may be good to suggest for an upcoming developer meeting. DIR might have
an advantage of being faster than a method and is probably closest to Satoshi's
described case. Kerne#file might be second best; Kernel#DIR would be a bit
strange, though. People might then wonder why an upcased method name would be
added and why there are not more upcased methods in ruby ... or why there are
then both upcased and lowercased methods in ruby that include __ as part of their
name :) so I think the other two suggestions would be better than the DIR
suggestion (if any of them could be approved that is).

Updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 13 days ago

  • Status changed from Open to Rejected

__FILE__ and __LINE__ are inherited from C preprocessor. Others aren't. I am not going to pursue consistency here.

Matz.

Also available in: Atom PDF