Ruby Issue Tracking System

10/09/2016

02:30 PM Ruby master Feature #6284: Add composition for procs

I wrote a gem with a C extension of `Proc#compose`: https://github.com/mooreniemi/proc_compose#usage
What motivate... why-capslock-though (Alexander Moore-Niemi)

12/03/2014

03:32 AM Ruby master Feature #7511: short-circuiting logical implication operator

to be precise, implies is a derived operator, not a core one.
racket has this operator, as does eiffel, which supp... why-capslock-though (Alexander Moore-Niemi)

08/28/2014

02:44 PM Ruby master Misc #10178: refinements unactivated within refine block scope?

I had posted some more code but remembered "send" doesn't apply yet! Sorry for my confusion. Any plans on indirect me... why-capslock-though (Alexander Moore-Niemi)

01:33 PM Ruby master Misc #10178: refinements unactivated within refine block scope?

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> In general, the scope inside a method definition is different from outside.
> Consider me... why-capslock-though (Alexander Moore-Niemi)

03:03 AM Ruby master Misc #10178: refinements unactivated within refine block scope?

Here is an executable version of what I was roughing out above, I apologize for not vetting it beforehand to prevent ... why-capslock-though (Alexander Moore-Niemi)

02:50 AM Ruby master Misc #10178: refinements unactivated within refine block scope?

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> I can't get your point.
> `Module#refine` requires a block, so your code doesn't work, si... why-capslock-though (Alexander Moore-Niemi)

02:10 AM Ruby master Misc #10178 (Closed): refinements unactivated within refine block scope?

I doubt I am seeing a bug, but I was hoping someone could clarify for me the reason why I am seeing what I see. I tri... why-capslock-though (Alexander Moore-Niemi)