gustavo.pedrosa (Gustavo Frederico Temple Pedrosa)
- Login: gustavo.pedrosa
- Registered on: 07/14/2014
- Last sign in: 01/14/2015
Issues
open | closed | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reported issues | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Activity
07/23/2014
- 05:11 PM Ruby master Feature #10087 (Closed): [PATCH] Specifying "target_cpu" for structure packing in ppc64
- This change adds new "target_cpu" for structure packing in ppc64.
~~~
- [x86*|i?86|x64], [packed_struct_unaligned... - 11:28 AM Ruby master Feature #10081: [PATCH] Specifying MACRO for increase performence in ppc64
- Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> PowerPC64 can unaligned access?
Yes, I have tested in my IBM POWER 7+ (rev 2.1)
07/22/2014
- 06:48 PM Ruby master Bug #10080: Functions marked as "static inline" are not inlined by gcc
- Eric Wong wrote:
> gustavo.pedrosa@eldorado.org.br wrote:
> > So, can I close this issue?
>
> Sure.
I don'... - 06:15 PM Ruby master Bug #10080: Functions marked as "static inline" are not inlined by gcc
- Eric Wong wrote:
> I don't think removing "inline" is necessary, either. It is a hint
> to the compiler (and as e... - 04:31 PM Ruby master Bug #10080: Functions marked as "static inline" are not inlined by gcc
- Eric Wong wrote:
> Can you show a performance difference with always_inline on those
> functions?
>
> Inlinin... - 06:40 PM Ruby master Feature #10081 (Closed): [PATCH] Specifying MACRO for increase performence in ppc64
- To increase performance on ppc64 machines, the MACRO "powerpc64" were specified for the architecture, just like for x...
07/21/2014
- 04:50 PM Ruby master Bug #10080 (Rejected): Functions marked as "static inline" are not inlined by gcc
- Since GCC 4.8.3, some static inline functions (such as rb_call0) are not
inlined in the generated machine code. This... - 04:19 PM Ruby master Bug #10079 (Closed): Warnings in definition of macro 'PACKED_STRUCT'
- After the commit db433dc39d07449184a908d417919e3de8b70405, the building shows many warnings like below:
~~~
compi...
Also available in: Atom