Ruby Issue Tracking System

10/24/2022

05:08 AM Ruby master Bug #19080: String Range inclusion using `===` broken

I've found this which illustrates that it uses `String#cover?` but that's really confusing for me at least:
https://... baweaver (Brandon Weaver)

05:00 AM Ruby master Bug #19080 (Rejected): String Range inclusion using `===` broken

When using `===` implicitly for a pattern match I noticed a behavior which I believe is a bug in Ruby. `===` does not... baweaver (Brandon Weaver)

10/23/2022

03:37 AM Ruby master Feature #18821: Expose Pattern Matching interfaces in core classes

We might consider `Net::HTTP::Response`, I can get a PR out against that one shortly. Simple implementation might be:... baweaver (Brandon Weaver)

10/20/2022

05:30 AM Ruby master Bug #19033: One-liner pattern match as Boolean arg syntax error

mame (Yusuke Endoh) wrote in #note-6:
> Note that `foo(1, 2, 3 in ary)` could be inherently ambiguous. It can be int... baweaver (Brandon Weaver)

10/19/2022

12:52 AM Ruby master Feature #19063: Hash.new with non-value objects should be less confusing

etienne (Étienne Barrié) wrote in #note-24:
> While I like the idea of checking the arity of the block, maybe the co... baweaver (Brandon Weaver)

10/17/2022

05:49 PM Ruby master Feature #19063: Hash.new with non-value objects should be less confusing

I would agree that `Hash.new { [] }` would be very nice, and as mentioned has a dual in `Array.new(5) { [] }`.
Whi... baweaver (Brandon Weaver)

03:04 AM Ruby master Feature #19063: Hash.new with non-value objects should be less confusing

> austin (Austin Ziegler) wrote in #note-4:
> So this is *very* widespread, and experienced Rubyists make this mista... baweaver (Brandon Weaver)

03:01 AM Ruby master Feature #19063: Hash.new with non-value objects should be less confusing

> For note, coming up with a lot of examples pointing towards that is not a proof.
Then what would qualify as a pr... baweaver (Brandon Weaver)

02:54 AM Ruby master Feature #19063: Hash.new with non-value objects should be less confusing

sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada) wrote in #note-2:
> > When people use Hash.new([]) they mean Hash.new { |h, k| h[k] = [] }.
> ... baweaver (Brandon Weaver)

10/16/2022

10:24 PM Ruby master Feature #19063 (Open): Hash.new with non-value objects should be less confusing

Related to #10713 and #2764.
Ruby's `Hash.new` accepts either a block or a param for its default value. In the cas... baweaver (Brandon Weaver)