General

Profile

vo.x (Vit Ondruch)

Issues

open closed Total
Assigned issues 0 1 1
Reported issues 25 279 304

Activity

03/31/2026

06:48 PM Ruby Feature #21973: Smile argument
My email client does not like this proposal:
<img style="width: 232px;" src="clipboard-202603312047-a8wkw.png"><br>
Maybe `:))` (even bigger smile) should be considered instead?
vo.x (Vit Ondruch)

03/22/2026

10:04 AM Ruby Feature #21960: Improve #backtrace to not confuse terminals
byroot (Jean Boussier) wrote in #note-6:
> I'm not 100% sure I understand what you mean.
When the backticks were changed, I have seen more broken test suites then the actual code. And the test suites typically checks error text outpu...
vo.x (Vit Ondruch)

03/21/2026

07:45 PM Ruby Feature #21960: Improve #backtrace to not confuse terminals
> This however has some small backward compatibly consequences, as code parsing backtraces with regexps isn't that rare.
> ...
This is typically not the case for test suites, unfortunately
vo.x (Vit Ondruch)

12/16/2025

11:26 AM Ruby Feature #6012: Proc#source_location also return the column
And RSpec were also adjusted to the new behavior AFAICT:
https://github.com/rspec/rspec/pull/282/commits/1c20fa80772ca7a1ed0512056ce7cd6a94f8e68d
vo.x (Vit Ondruch)
11:25 AM Ruby Feature #6012: Proc#source_location also return the column
Just FTR, not sure how the revert is supposed to look like, but at least Pry was adjusted for the new behavior:
https://github.com/pry/pry/pull/2357
It does not benefit from columns, but I suspect the revert would somehow influence...
vo.x (Vit Ondruch)

12/01/2025

03:28 PM Ruby Feature #20437: Could the licensing conditions be made less ambiguous?
matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote in #note-8:
> I think“Ruby's License” is something described in COPYING, i.e., it is inseparable from BSD-2clause. Historically it was combination with GPL, so some description should be updated.
> ...
T...
vo.x (Vit Ondruch)

11/28/2025

04:57 PM Ruby Bug #21718: TypeError:wrong argument type ... (expected Array)
vo.x (Vit Ondruch) wrote in #note-10:
> And I have not tried what would happen if the array returned by `instance_variables_to_inspect` contained some garbage ...
Just tested a few examples:
~~~
$ irb
irb(main):001* class Foo
i...
vo.x (Vit Ondruch)
04:41 PM Ruby Bug #21718: TypeError:wrong argument type ... (expected Array)
byroot (Jean Boussier) wrote in #note-9:
> I think the better solution here is to pre-define `Kernel#instance_variables_to_inspect`
That solves one part. But if this is considered acceptable, could the error message (and/or documenta...
vo.x (Vit Ondruch)
03:10 PM Ruby Bug #21718: TypeError:wrong argument type ... (expected Array)
In retrospect, is the `instance_variables_to_inspect` design good? Wouldn't it be better if such method behaved as some filter? E.g. it would get e.g. an array of something (maybe list of instance variables?), which could be altered and ... vo.x (Vit Ondruch)
02:42 PM Ruby Bug #21718: TypeError:wrong argument type ... (expected Array)
This is essentially what happens:
~~~
$ irb
irb(main):001* class Foo
irb(main):002* def initialize
irb(main):003* @bar = "bar"
irb(main):004* end
irb(main):005> end
=> :initialize
irb(main):006> Foo.new.inspect
=> "...
vo.x (Vit Ondruch)

Also available in: Atom