nuzair46 (Nuzair Rasheed)
- Login: nuzair46
- Registered on: 07/24/2025
- Last sign in: 08/05/2025
Issues
| open | closed | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reported issues | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Activity
08/21/2025
-
09:30 AM Ruby Feature #21520: Feature Proposal: Enumerator::Lazy#tee
- matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote in #note-11:
> I don't think `lazy_each` is a good name. We just wanted to peek the element in the stream, being lazy or not. In that sense, `tee` is better, if you are familiar with UNIX (like me).
> ..... -
- nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) wrote in #note-9:
> A couple days ago, another name came to me: `tee`.
Thanks, `tee` is a great fit. It’s short and feels very Unix-y. I will make changes to the PR and the proposal soon.
08/05/2025
-
- The PR is open for review https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/14024
07/30/2025
-
- updated to `lazy_each`
07/28/2025
-
- nuzair46 (Nuzair Rasheed) wrote in #note-3:
> Enumerator#peek [works differently](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/ja/latest/method/Enumerator/i/peek.html) than this suggestion.
> ...
Running the whole CI, I see the collision with Enumerato...
07/25/2025
-
- Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme) wrote in #note-2:
> #peek already exists, and does something different.
Hey, Enumerator#peek exists. but Enumerator::Lazy#peek does not.
Enumerator#peek [works differently](https://docs.ruby-lang.org/ja/late...
07/24/2025
-
- # Abstract
Add a #tee method to Enumerator::Lazy that allows observing each element in a lazy enumeration pipeline without modifying or consuming the stream.
# Background
Ruby provides Enumerator::Lazy for efficient lazy stream ...