=begin This leads to situation when MRI built on Windows from git-based repo doesn't show the actual SVN revision: ruby 1.9.2dev (2010-03-14) [i386-mingw32]
This is a regression caused by recent changes in file2lastrev.rb file.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote: > 2010/2/1 James Edward Gray II <james@graysoftinc.com>: >> I say that meaning that CSV has a lot of tests in Ruby itself. Does RubySpec not make an e...vvs (Vladimir Sizikov)
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote: > 2010/1/22 Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@headius.com>: > >> So then in general, the new functionality is useless and should not be >> used, since ev...vvs (Vladimir Sizikov)
=begin On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote: > 2010/1/21 Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net>: > >> This always returns true even on platforms where fork is not actually supported. See >> my Redmine reply. ...vvs (Vladimir Sizikov)
=begin On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> wrote: > On 1/21/10 10:53 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote: >> respond_to? returns false for methods which is not implemented since 1.9.2. >> >> See NEWS. > > Ah, that ...vvs (Vladimir Sizikov)
=begin If this ticket is rejected, should the RubySpecs reverted as well? Otherwise, they'll continue to fail on all implementations. =end vvs (Vladimir Sizikov)