Ruby Issue Tracking System

04/13/2020

03:31 AM Ruby Feature #15897: `it` as a default block parameter

jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote in #note-39:
> I'm going to close this feature since numbered block parameters were introduced to address it.
Noted. But I think there might have been some confusion.
In my opinion, the spirit o... joallard (Jonathan Allard)

02/12/2020

01:15 AM Ruby Feature #15897: `it` as a default block parameter

It seems like this issue is stagnant. Is there anything needed for this to go forward? joallard (Jonathan Allard)

01:14 AM Ruby Feature #15236: add support for hash shorthand

I support this proposal in its simplest form. I do not think changing method argument syntax is a good idea.
@osyo above makes a good point, if your variables are well named:
```ruby
User.new(id: id, age: age, name: name, registered_at... joallard (Jonathan Allard)

07/07/2019

09:04 PM Ruby Feature #15897: `it` as a default block parameter

Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote:
> I think this ambiguity is fairly intuitive and easy to resolve:
> ...
I would echo Benoit's comments here. As an avid RSpec user, I employ `it "does something"` without a block fairly often for prototyp... joallard (Jonathan Allard)

06/02/2019

03:17 AM Ruby Misc #15723: Reconsider numbered parameters

Seems to me like there's some kind of consensus about making this feature available for one argument only.
I would echo the desire to go with `it`, in line with Ruby's principles of elegance. It seems most objections that have been ra... joallard (Jonathan Allard)