stuyam (Stuart Yamartino)
- Login: stuyam
- Registered on: 01/15/2020
- Last sign in: 03/01/2024
Issues
open | closed | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reported issues | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Activity
02/15/2024
- 10:23 PM Ruby master Feature #20080: Introduce #bounds method on Range
- Thanks for the feedback @matz! Is it the word `bounds` that you don't like in relation to the start and end values of...
01/23/2024
- 06:08 PM Ruby master Feature #20080: Introduce #bounds method on Range
- @hsbt I just added to the next meeting, thank you for letting me know! https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20193#note-4
- 06:02 PM Ruby master Misc #20193: DevMeeting-2024-02-14
- * [Feature #20080] Introduce #bounds method on Range (stuyam)
* `#bounds` method on range to return raw bound data ...
01/17/2024
- 04:27 PM Ruby master Misc #20075: DevMeeting-2024-01-17
- * [Ticket #20080] Introduce #bounds method on Range (stuyam)
* Easier serialization of ranges, easy array deconstr...
12/22/2023
- 06:57 PM Ruby master Feature #20080: Introduce #bounds method on Range
- @Dan0042 great idea! At first I was against this because I thought it would make deconstruction harder but it actuall...
- 05:55 PM Ruby master Feature #20080: Introduce #bounds method on Range
- @ufuk I like `#bounds` as a name also, great suggestion, let's try that. And thank you for showing beginless and endl...
- 04:26 PM Ruby master Feature #20080 (Feedback): Introduce #bounds method on Range
- Followup Reference: #20027
**Update 1/11/24:** (based on many wonderful suggestions!)
1. Call the method `#bou... - 04:31 PM Ruby master Feature #20027: Add Range Deconstruction
- Conversation moved to new issue for implementation of `#begin_and_end` method on Range: #20080
- 03:39 PM Ruby master Feature #20027: Add Range Deconstruction
- Yeah great point @Dan0042, `#minmax` _almost_ works, but as you point out it does not work because if the range is a ...
12/21/2023
- 08:47 PM Ruby master Feature #20027: Add Range Deconstruction
- Thanks for the thoughtful responses @shan and @mame!
Shan, you make great points. With the next `it` syntax coming i...
Also available in: Atom