>For specifying namespace, "using" is used in many languages, C++, C# >etc. On the other hand, as far as I know, no language use the keyword >"use" for namespaces, but for other purposes. For example, Perl6's ...Chauk-Mean (Chauk-Mean Proum)
=begin 11/27/2010 09:46 AM - Loren Segal wrote : >> I also prefer use instead of using. >> May be the core team can request Rack developers to rename their use method to e.g. rack_use. >> I guess that this new feature will be avai...Chauk-Mean (Chauk-Mean Proum)
=begin >> Regarding naming: how about using the name `use' instead of `using'? This >> would be in line with other names such as `include', `extend', etc.
Given the discussion from http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/469691#new ,
I revised my proposal as following : For Object#extend, the hook/callbacks methods would be : - pre_extended (instead of extend_object) - extend...Chauk-Mean (Chauk-Mean Proum)
For Object#extend, the hook/callbacks methods are extend_object and extended. For Module#include, the hook/callbacks methods are append_features and included.
So rake sh command will not work with Ruby 1.9.1 on Windows ? I really don't understand why this issue has been removed for 1.9.1. It's a pity as the fix I provided is very simple. =end Chauk-Mean (Chauk-Mean Proum)
=begin >MSYS is a official package on top of MinGW, but not required. You can build a >MinGW version of ruby using Cygwin. ># Note that Cygwin shells can kick .bat scripts
=begin > (1) As far as I understand MinGW do not have a shell (apart from cmd.exe). > So installing shell scripts on MinGW systems makes no sense to me.