Fjan (Jan Maurits Faber)
- Login: Fjan
- Email: jmfaber@faberix.com
- Registered on: 11/06/2008
- Last sign in: 02/11/2017
Issues
| open | closed | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reported issues | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Activity
06/10/2016
-
02:34 PM Ruby Feature #715: Ruby interpreter should understand UTF-8 symbols with special meaning
- Ok, I agree that it's probably a good idea to introduce well known symbols like ≥ at first to avoid confusion. But I don't think the argument that it's hard to type on your particular computer is valid, partly because your editor could ...
-
12:12 PM Ruby Feature #715: Ruby interpreter should understand UTF-8 symbols with special meaning
- It's really easy to remember: to type ≥ is just alt + >, to type ≤ is alt + < and ≠ is alt + =, so I don't think you would need a character picker for very long. But more importantly using the new symbols would be entirely optional. If y...
06/09/2016
-
09:39 AM Ruby Feature #715: Ruby interpreter should understand UTF-8 symbols with special meaning
- Both APL and Fortress predate decent UTF-8 support by a long time, I'm not sure that the fact that those failed in the past is still a convincing reason to reject out of hand the human factor advantages this could have. Do we want to lim...
06/06/2016
-
06:30 PM Ruby Feature #715: Ruby interpreter should understand UTF-8 symbols with special meaning
- Just in case someone stumbled upon this old rejected feature request: there is a clever way of achieving most of this by using a font with ligatures that combines successive ascii characters into ligatures:
https://github.com/tonsky/Fir...
11/06/2008
-
10:07 PM Ruby Feature #715 (Rejected): Ruby interpreter should understand UTF-8 symbols with special meaning
- I would like the ruby interpreter to understand symbols such as the greater-than-or-equal sign, as an alias for '>='.
This is not simply because it would look pretty, it would reduce the cognitive load on the programmer. At the moment...