adh1003 (Andrew Hodgkinson)
- Login: adh1003
- Email: ahodgkin@rowing.org.uk
- Registered on: 11/02/2015
- Last sign in: 06/16/2022
Issues
open | closed | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reported issues | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Activity
06/16/2022
- 04:54 AM Ruby master Bug #18833: Documentation for IO#gets is inaccurate (bytes versus characters)
- Correction - the `IO#gets` data for a UTF-8 input stream including BOM *does* include the BOM as an invisible first c...
- 04:02 AM Ruby master Bug #18833: Documentation for IO#gets is inaccurate (bytes versus characters)
- For avoidance of doubt, the behaviour of Ruby itself is (IMHO) sensible and working well. The only change needed is t...
- 04:01 AM Ruby master Bug #18833 (Rejected): Documentation for IO#gets is inaccurate (bytes versus characters)
- Please see https://ruby-doc.org/core-3.1.2/IO.html#method-i-gets:
> With integer argument `limit` given, returns u...
11/07/2019
- 12:02 AM Ruby master Feature #16276: For consideration: "private do...end" / "protected do...end"
- shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) wrote:
> I can think of other cursed usages of private taking a block.
Then it is for...
10/30/2019
- 07:08 PM Ruby master Feature #16276: For consideration: "private do...end" / "protected do...end"
- shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) wrote:
> Yes, I agree we don't copy C++ / Java. What I wonder is _any_ other language w...
10/29/2019
- 08:38 PM Ruby master Feature #16276: For consideration: "private do...end" / "protected do...end"
- shevegen (Robert A. Heiler) wrote:
> > As noted in the pseudocode above, we can clean up some of the issues around...
10/23/2019
- 07:49 PM Ruby master Feature #16276 (Open): For consideration: "private do...end" / "protected do...end"
- Private or protected declarations in Ruby classes are problematic. The single, standalone `public`, `private` or `pro...
09/12/2019
- 01:04 AM Ruby master Bug #16165: Endless ranges have inconsistency between #cover? and #include?
- For the sake of archives & potential future search engine hits - this got fixed a few days ago and will be in whateve...
09/11/2019
- 11:31 PM Ruby master Bug #16165: Endless ranges have inconsistency between #cover? and #include?
- Doh, this needs closing; my apologies. I had not realised that I was testing in an execution environment that had pul...
- 09:59 PM Ruby master Bug #16165 (Closed): Endless ranges have inconsistency between #cover? and #include?
- In an endless Range, I'd expect to be able to use `#include?` just as I do with a Range that has an end value. It wou...
Also available in: Atom