robb (Robb Shecter)
- Login: robb
- Email: robb+ruby@weblaws.org
- Registered on: 10/22/2015
- Last sign in: 07/20/2021
Issues
open | closed | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Assigned issues | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reported issues | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Activity
07/20/2021
- 08:47 AM Ruby master Bug #12235: URI.encode issue with square brackets
- I just ran into this. My app is generating URLs which it cannot then parse.
02/17/2020
- 01:30 AM Ruby master Feature #15563: #dig that throws an exception if a key doesn't exist
- matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote in #note-4:
> And with whatever name, we need the real-world use-case for a new meth... - 01:05 AM Ruby master Feature #15563: #dig that throws an exception if a key doesn't exist
- amcaplan (Ariel Caplan) wrote in #note-13:
> matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
> > [...] with whatever name, we need t... - 12:48 AM Ruby master Feature #14602: Version of dig that raises error if a key is not present
- amcaplan (Ariel Caplan) wrote:
> The Hash#dig method made it easy to access methods safely from a nested hash; I'd l...
12/28/2018
- 05:31 AM Ruby master Feature #12282: Hash#dig! for repeated applications of Hash#fetch
- Another naming idea is `#fetch_all`, signalling that this is essentially a `#fetch` over a list of keys.
- 05:15 AM Ruby master Feature #12282: Hash#dig! for repeated applications of Hash#fetch
- Thanks everyone, for the discussion. I realize that my original comparison with #dig had a typographical error. Here'...
- 05:27 AM Ruby master Feature #15477 (Open): Proc#arity returns -1 for composed lambda Procs of known arguments
- ```
f = -> x { x + 2 }
g = -> x { x * 2 }
h = f << g
f.arity # => 1
g.arity # => 1
h.arity # => -1 THIS SHOU...
04/14/2016
- 06:35 AM Ruby master Feature #12282 (Open): Hash#dig! for repeated applications of Hash#fetch
- A new feature for your consideration: #dig! which is to #fetch as #dig is to #[]. For me and maybe many others, Hash#...
10/22/2015
- 09:12 AM Ruby master Misc #11295: Request for comments about error messages
- See also "Clarify the error message when calling a method with the wrong number of arguments", https://bugs.ruby-lang...
- 09:11 AM Ruby master Feature #9025: Clarify the error message when calling a method with the wrong number of arguments
- "(expected: 1, provided: 0)" is excellent. This is a big usability issue. Python's message is similar, and includes t...
Also available in: Atom