Project

General

Profile

Misc #15229

Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) about 6 years ago

Please comment your favorite ticket numbers you want to ask to discuss with your *SHORT* comment or summary. 
 (your summary/comment will help us because we don't need to read all of ticket comments) 

 *DO NOT* discuss then on this ticket, please. 

 ---- 

 Date: 2018/11/22 (Thu) 
 Time: 14:00-18:00 (JST) 
 Place: pixiv Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) 
 Sign-up: https://connpass.com/event/105368/ 
 log: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nDScdLanB-6qK3rIG5DWO0j6f1sV4ZFoSCBw5I7AdjQ/pub 
 logedit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nDScdLanB-6qK3rIG5DWO0j6f1sV4ZFoSCBw5I7AdjQ/edit 

 # NOTES 

 - Dev meeting *IS NOT* a decision making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker. 
 - Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly. 
 - Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue). 
 - We will write a log about discussion to a file or to each ticket in English. 
 - All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers). 
 - The date, time and place is scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time. 

 # Agenda 

 ## Next dev-meeting 

 ## About 2.6 timeframe 

 ## Check security tickets 

 ## Carry-over from previous meeting(s) 

 ## From Attendees 

 * Thu Nov 22 04:18:01 2018    Koichi Sasada <ko1@atdot.net> 
 * [Feature #15230] RubyVM.resolve_feature_path (mame) 
   * I'd like this feature to investigate what will be loaded by require(feature). 
 * [Feature #15231] Remove `Object#=~` (mame) 
   * The method looks useless, and made a trouble at least for me.    I'd like to hear opinions from other committers. 
 * [Feature #11689] Add methods allow us to get visibility from Method and UnboundMethod object. (yui-knk) 
   * I want to introduce this feature to help meta programming. I'd like to hear opinions from other committers. 
 * [Feature #15286] Proposal: Add Kernel.#expand(*args) (aycabta) 
 * [Bug #15285] lambda return behavior regression from #14639 (nobu) 
 * [Feature #15289] Accept "target" keyword on `TracePoint#enable` (ko1) 
 * [Feature #15287] New TracePoint events to support loading features (ko1) 

 ## From non-attendees 

 * [Bug #14127] (CSV) generating UTF-16LE encoded file without BOM (nobu) 
   * Although this is not a bug of csv.rb, I'd suggest to enable "`bom|`" flag when writing instead. 
     https://github.com/nobu/ruby/tree/bug/14127-bom-header 
 * [Feature #15220] Adding OpenSSL 1.1.1 on Travis CI gcc-8 case (jaruga) 
   * To detect an issue for the latest OpenSSL early and guarantee a Ruby version supporting a OpenSSL version. 
 * [Feature #15301] `Symbol#call`, returning method bound with arguments (zverok) 
 * [Feature #15302] Proc#with and Proc#by, for partial function application and currying (Ritchie Buitre) 
   * Convenient methods for functional programming. 
 * [Bug #14968] make all pipes and sockets non-blocking by default (normalperson) 
 * [Feature #13618] Thread::Light for 2.6 [ruby-core:89900] (normalperson) 
 * [Feature #15317] How to deal with obsolete property values in Unicode 11.0.0 (duerst) 
   * A clear idea on this is needed to upgrade to Unicode 11.0.0. 
 * [Feature #13890] Allow a regexp as an argument to 'count', to count more interesting things than single characters (duerst) 
   * I find this missing regularly, and writing it by hand in Ruby is clumsy, so addition would be valuable. 
 * [Feature #12698] Method to delete a substring by regex match (duerst) 
 * [Feature #10548] remove callcc (Callcc is now going obsoleted. Please use Fiber.) (ioquatix) 
   * It's unofficially deprecated, unsupported in most implementations of Ruby, and not used very much. Do you think it's a good idea to drop support by 3.0? 
 * [Feature #15327] Proposal: Enable refinements to `#respond_to?` (osyo) 
 * [Feature #15326] Proposal: Enable refinements to `#public_send` (osyo) 
 * [Feature #15114] Symbol#to_proc does not work with refinements? (osyo) 
   * I want to more refinements! 

 ---- 

 Please comment your favorite ticket we need to discuss with *the following format*. 

 ``` 
 * [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name) 
   * your comment why you want to put this ticket here if you want to add. 
 ``` 

 Your comment is very important if you are no attendee because we can not ask why you want to discuss about it. 

 Example: 

 ``` 
 * [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1) 
   * I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss about this feature. 
 ``` 

 I don't guarantee to put tickets in agenda if the comment violate the format (because it is hard to copy&paste).

Back