Misc #14698
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) over 6 years ago
Date: 2018/05/17 (Thu) Time: 14:00-18:00 (JST) Place: Cookpad Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) Sign-up: https://ruby.connpass.com/event/85917/ Please comment your favorite ticket numbers you want to ask to discuss with your *SHORT* comment or summary. (your summary/comment will help us because we don't need to read all of ticket comments) *DO NOT* discuss then on this ticket, please. From this time, we use a ticket to make dev-meeting agenda page instead of a wiki page <https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki>. # NOTE Dev meeting *IS NOT* a decision making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker. Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly. Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue). We will write a log about discussion to a file or to each ticket in English. All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers). The date, time and place is scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time. # Agenda ## Next dev-meeting ## About 2.6 timeframe ## From Attendees * [Bug #14699] Subtle behaviors with endless range (mame) * [Feature #14724] chains of inequalities (Martin) * Proposal by gotoken (Kentaro Goto) to allow `0 <= a < 10` as a shortcut of `0<=a && a<10`, and so on; patch by Nobu avaliable (will be edited later) (if you have a write access permission, please list directly) ## From non-attendees * [Feature #14697] Introducing Range#% as an alias to Range#step (mrkn) * Matz already commented LGTM. Please judge whether this is acceptable. * [Feature #14724] chains of inequations (mrkn) * This new syntax can also reduce the duplicated evaluations of common terms, such as `timeval.tv_sec` in the descriptiohn of the proposal. Functional programming: (zverok) * [Feature #6284] Add composition for procs * 6-year-old proposal. Matz: "Positive about adding function composition. But we need method name consensus before adding it? Is `#*` OK for everyone?" * [Feature #13581] Syntax sugar for method reference * 1-year-old proposal. Matz: "I am for adding syntax sugar for method reference. But I don't like proposed syntax (e.g. `->`). Any other idea?" * [Feature #11161] Proc/Method#rcurry working like curry but in reverse order * 3-year-old proposal with absolutely no reaction. I've added real-life examples there several months ago. * [Feature #14390] UnboundMethod#to_proc * [Feature #14423] Enumerator from single object (`Object#enumerate`) Misc: * [Bug #14575] Switch `Range#===` to use `cover?` instead of `include?` (zverok) * Docs (probably not to discuss on development meeting, but I am not sure where I can post it to have it more visible) (zverok) * Method: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14483 * Proc: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14610 * MatchData: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14450 * yield_self: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14436 * [Feature #14473] Add Range#subrange? ( greggzst ) * [Feature #14097] Add union and difference to Array ( ana06) * [Feature #14105] Introduce xor as alias for Set#^ ( ana06) * [Misc #14760] cross-thread IO#close semantics (normal) (will be edited later) (if you have a write access, please list directly)