Bug #12058
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) almost 9 years ago
I noticed a surprising behavior when invoking `__callee__` in an aliased method. When invoked via a method created by `alias_method`, `__callee__` ignores the name of the old method (here `xxx`) and returns the name of the new method, as below: ~~~ruby ~~~ class Foo def xxx() __callee__ end alias_method :foo, :xxx end Foo.new.foo # => :foo ~~~ This behavior holds even when `xxx` is inherited from a superclass: ~~~ruby ~~~ class Sup def xxx() __callee__ end end class Bar < Sup alias_method :bar, :xxx end Bar.new.bar # => :bar ~~~ Given both of the above, I would expect that the same behavior would hold when `xxx` is included via a module. However, that is not the case: ~~~ruby ~~~ module Mod def xxx() __callee__ end end class Baz include Mod alias_method :baz, :xxx end Baz.new.baz # => :xxx ~~~ I expect the return value to be `:baz`, not `:xxx`. Is this a bug, or is there an important difference between superclass inheritance and module inclusion that I've failed to grasp here? Origin: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35281623/unexpected-value-of-callee-when-including-a-module-is-this-a-ruby-bug