wrong documentation for Regex#==/eql?
The documentation states that "Two regexps are equal if their patterns are identical, they have the same character set code, and their casefold? values are the same" and gives the following example:
/abc/ == /abc/n #=> false
In fact, this returns true -- the /n character set code option is a special case.
Updated by drbrain (Eric Hodel) about 8 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
This issue was solved with changeset r35600.
John, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.
- re.c (rb_reg_equal): Removed incorrect example for Regexp#== with "n" option. [ruby-talk - Bug #6415]