Project

General

Profile

Bug #12099

Documentation for Proc#call and Proc#[] missing from Ruby-Doc.Org.

Added by jwmittag (Jörg W Mittag) over 4 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
[ruby-core:73920]

Description

The documentation for the instance methods Proc#call and Proc#[] is missing from Ruby-Doc.Org despite being present in the source: source:proc.c#L731.

I am not sure whether this is an issue with Ruby-Doc, RDoc, or the formatting in the source file, though.


Related issues

Related to Ruby master - Bug #12332: [PATCH] proc.c: fix RDoc of Proc#===/call/yield/[]ClosedActions

Updated by jwmittag (Jörg W Mittag) over 4 years ago

  • Subject changed from Documentation for [`Proc#call`](http://ruby-doc.org/core/Proc.html#method-i-call) and [`Proc#[]`](http://ruby-doc.org/core/Proc.html#method-i-5B-5D) missing from [Ruby-Doc.Org](http://ruby-doc.org/). to Documentation for Proc#call and Proc#[] missing from Ruby-Doc.Org.
  • Description updated (diff)

Updated by jwmittag (Jörg W Mittag) over 4 years ago

Jörg W Mittag wrote:

The documentation for the instance methods Proc#call and Proc#[] is missing from Ruby-Doc.Org despite being present in the source: source:proc.c#L731.

I am not sure whether this is an issue with Ruby-Doc, RDoc, or the formatting in the source file, though.

The documentation is correctly present in 2.2.4 and all older versions, and since there haven't been any changes to the documentation comment in between 2.2.4 and 2.3.0, the documentation comment itself cannot be the problem. So, it must be either an issue with how RDoc parses the comment or how Ruby-Doc.Org generates the documentation.

#3

Updated by stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer) over 3 years ago

  • Related to Bug #12332: [PATCH] proc.c: fix RDoc of Proc#===/call/yield/[] added

Updated by stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer) over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Closed

Closing, this should have been solved with #12332.

Also available in: Atom PDF