Backport #6179
closedFile::pos broken in Windows 1.9.3p125
Description
Calling the pos method on a File in the Windows version of Ruby on 1.9.3p125 moves the file pointer. Thus it can not be called without side effect.
Files
Updated by daz (Dave B) almost 13 years ago
Please provide a short code example which demonstrates
how you're checking the condition.
Have you haven't coded something like:
"if pos = 12" instead of "if pos == 12"
which would accidentally set the file position?
daz
Updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena) almost 13 years ago
=begin
jmthomas (Jason Thomas) wrote:
Calling the pos method on a File in the Windows version of Ruby on 1.9.3p125 moves the file pointer. Thus it can not be called without side effect.
Are you talking about File#pos or File#pos=?
Can you create an example like the following?
1.9.3p125 :003 > File.write "foo", "This is one line\nThis is second line\n"
=> 37
1.9.3p125 :004 > f = File.open "foo"
=> #File:foo
1.9.3p125 :005 > f.pos
=> 0
1.9.3p125 :006 > f.gets
=> "This is one line\n"
1.9.3p125 :007 > f.pos
=> 17
1.9.3p125 :008 > f.gets
=> "This is second line\n"
1.9.3p125 :009 > f.pos
=> 37
1.9.3p125 :010 > f.close
=> nil
1.9.3p125 :011 > exit
=end
Updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena) almost 13 years ago
- Category set to core
- Status changed from Open to Feedback
- Priority changed from 5 to Normal
Updated by phasis68 (Heesob Park) almost 13 years ago
I am not sure this issue is same to the following behavior.
But I found a bug of File#pos in trunk version.
C:\work>type foo.txt
1234567890
C:\work>ruby -v
ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-03-20 trunk 35094) [i386-mswin32_100]
C:\work>irb
irb(main):001:0> a = File.open('foo.txt')
=> #File:foo.txt
irb(main):002:0> a.pos
=> 0
irb(main):003:0> a.getc
=> "1"
irb(main):004:0> a.pos
=> 2
irb(main):005:0> a.getc
=> "3"
irb(main):006:0> a.pos
=> 4
irb(main):007:0> a.getc
=> "5"
irb(main):008:0> a.pos
=> 6
Whereas ruby 1.9.3p125 works as expected.
C:\work>ruby -v
ruby 1.9.3p125 (2012-02-16) [i386-mingw32]
C:\work>irb
irb(main):001:0> a = File.open('foo.txt')
=> #File:foo.txt
irb(main):002:0> a.pos
=> 0
irb(main):003:0> a.getc
=> "1"
irb(main):004:0> a.pos
=> 1
irb(main):005:0> a.getc
=> "2"
irb(main):006:0> a.pos
=> 2
irb(main):007:0> a.getc
=> "3"
irb(main):008:0> a.pos
=> 3
Updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) almost 13 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
This issue was solved with changeset r35095.
Jason, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.
- test/ruby/test_io.rb (TestIO#test_pos_with_getc): added.
see [Bug #6179][ruby-core:43518]
Updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) almost 13 years ago
Hello,
In message "[ruby-core:43518] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6179] File::pos broken in Windows 1.9.3p125"
on Mar.21,2012 15:31:41, phasis@gmail.com wrote:
C:\work>irb
irb(main):001:0> a = File.open('foo.txt')
=> #File:foo.txt
irb(main):002:0> a.pos
=> 0
irb(main):003:0> a.getc
=> "1"
irb(main):004:0> a.pos
=> 2
irb(main):005:0> a.getc
=> "3"
irb(main):006:0> a.pos
=> 4
irb(main):007:0> a.getc
=> "5"
irb(main):008:0> a.pos
=> 6
Hmm, I can't reporoduce it with
ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-03-20 trunk 35087) [x64-mswin64_100]
I've added a test for this at r35095.¶
Regards,¶
U.Nakamura usa@garbagecollect.jp
Updated by phasis68 (Heesob Park) almost 13 years ago
I guess it is related with binary mode reading.
If I open a file with text mode, it works fine.
irb(main):001:0> a = File.open('foo.txt')
=> #File:foo.txt
irb(main):002:0> a.getc
=> "1"
irb(main):003:0> a.pos
=> 2
irb(main):004:0> a.getc
=> "3"
irb(main):005:0> a.pos
fptr->rbuf.len = 0
=> 4
irb(main):006:0> a = File.open('foo.txt','rt')
=> #File:foo.txt
irb(main):007:0> a.getc
=> "1"
irb(main):008:0> a.pos
fptr->rbuf.len = 0
=> 1
irb(main):009:0> a.getc
=> "2"
irb(main):010:0> a.pos
fptr->rbuf.len = 0
=> 2
irb(main):011:0> a.getc
=> "3"
irb(main):012:0> a.pos
fptr->rbuf.len = 0
=> 3
BTW, my test OS is Windows XP SP3.
Updated by jmthomas (Jason Thomas) almost 13 years ago
This is an issue on 1.9.3p125 on Windows and doesn't just affect binary mode. I ran Usaku's test case and it passes. However my test case fails! It appears the issue only presents itself when you try to read multiple characters? Try the following test:
def test_file_pos
File.open("test.txt", "w") {|file| file.write("Ruby's Windows\nFile::pos shouldn't\nbe broken\n")}
lines = ["Ruby's Windows\n", "File::pos shouldn't\n", "be broken\n"]
File.open("test.txt", "r") do |file|
lines.each do |line|
file.pos # Commenting out this line causes the test to pass!!!
read_line = file.readline
puts read_line
assert_equal line, read_line
end
end
end
Updated by jmthomas (Jason Thomas) almost 13 years ago
I have verified this issue doesn't affect 1.9.3p0.
Updated by phasis68 (Heesob Park) almost 13 years ago
The above example also affects binary mode.
If you change "r" to "rt", it works fine on 1.9.3p125.
File.open("test.txt", "w") {|file| file.write("Jason says\nThat Ruby shouldn't\nbe broken\n")}
def test_read (call_pos)
lines = ["Jason says\n", "That Ruby shouldn't\n", "be broken\n"]
File.open("test.txt", "rt") do |file|
lines.each do |line|
file.pos if call_pos # Moves file position on Ruby 1.9.3p125 on Windows
read_line = file.readline
puts read_line
raise "Error!" if line != read_line
end
end
end
Works¶
test_read(false)
puts
Works¶
test_read(true)
Updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena) almost 13 years ago
=begin
jmthomas (Jason Thomas) wrote:
This is an issue on 1.9.3p125 on Windows and doesn't just affect binary mode. I ran Usaku's test case and it passes. However my test case fails! It appears the issue only presents itself when you try to read multiple characters? Try the following test:
Are you sure your example is correct?
File#pos returns current position:
V:>irb
irb(main):001:0> File.write("foo", "line one\nline two\nline three\n")
=> 29
irb(main):002:0> f = File.open("foo")
=> #File:foo
irb(main):003:0> f.readline
=> "line one\n"
irb(main):004:0> f.pos
=> 10
irb(main):005:0> f.readline
=> "line two\n"
irb(main):006:0> f.pos
=> 20
irb(main):007:0> f.pos
=> 20
irb(main):008:0> f.pos
=> 20
irb(main):009:0> f.pos
=> 20
irb(main):010:0> f.readline
=> "line three\n"
irb(main):011:0> f.pos
=> 32
irb(main):012:0> f.pos
=> 32
Above works, f.pos is not changed at all.
So does using File#readlines and File#pos inside:
irb(main):015:0> f.readlines.each do |line|
irb(main):016:1* puts line
irb(main):017:1> f.pos
irb(main):018:1> end
line one
line two
line three
=> ["line one\n", "line two\n", "line three\n"]
=end
Updated by phasis68 (Heesob Park) almost 13 years ago
File.open with "r" means binary mode reading and it fails.
C:\work>irb
irb(main):001:0> File.write("foo", "line one\nline two\nline three\n")
=> 29
irb(main):002:0> f = File.open("foo","r")
=> #File:foo
irb(main):003:0> f.readline
=> "line one\n"
irb(main):004:0> f.pos
=> 12
irb(main):005:0> f.readline
=> "ne two\n"
irb(main):006:0> f.pos
=> 21
irb(main):007:0> f.pos
=> 21
irb(main):008:0> f.readline
=> "ine three\n"
irb(main):009:0> f.pos
=> 32
Updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena) almost 13 years ago
- Assignee set to h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki)
phasis68 (Heesob Park) wrote:
File.open with "r" means binary mode reading and it fails.
You mean that doing "r" (read) implies "binary"? because when open with "rb" works as expected:
V:>irb
irb(main):001:0> f = File.open "foo", "rb"
=> #File:foo
irb(main):002:0> f.readline
=> "Line one\r\n"
irb(main):003:0> f.pos
=> 10
irb(main):004:0> f.readline
=> "Line two\r\n"
But it fails when mode is implicit (only "r")
Confirmed it is a bug, assigning it.
Thank you.
Updated by ryanmelt (Ryan Melton) almost 13 years ago
This bug is still marked closed. I believe it should be open now that Luis has confirmed and assigned it, correct?
Updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena) almost 13 years ago
- Status changed from Closed to Assigned
Sorry, Redmine closed when Usa Nakamura committed a test for it. Reopening.
Updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena) almost 13 years ago
- ruby -v changed from 1.9.3p125 to ruby 1.9.3p125 (2012-02-16) [i386-mingw32]
Updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) almost 13 years ago
Hello,
In message "[ruby-core:43539] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6179][Assigned] File::pos broken in Windows 1.9.3p125"
on Mar.21,2012 23:44:22, luislavena@gmail.com wrote:
Status changed from Closed to Assigned
Sorry, Redmine closed when Usa Nakamura committed a test for it. Reopening.
Oops. Sorry, and thank you luis.
Commit-Redmine gateway is too difficult...
Regards,¶
U.Nakamura usa@garbagecollect.jp
Updated by h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki) almost 13 years ago
- File pos_fix.patch pos_fix.patch added
Thank you for your work.
I confirmed the bug. io_unread() with mode "r" had a bug. IO#pos calls io_unread().
Trunk also has same bug.
I've created a patch which replaces io_unread(). Heesob's test case was passed.
make test
&& make test-all
look fine.
The patch is against trunk.
Could you review and try the patch?
Updated by phasis68 (Heesob Park) almost 13 years ago
This issue is related with new line conversion.
I think Revision 35095 made a wrong test case.
test_pos_with_getc methods should be modified like this:
def test_pos_with_getc
bug6179 = '[ruby-core:43497]'
t = make_tempfile
open(t.path, "w") do |f|
f.write "0123456789\n"
end
open(t.path, "r") do |f|
assert_equal 0, f.pos
assert_equal '0', f.getc
assert_equal 1, f.pos
assert_equal '1', f.getc
assert_equal 2, f.pos
assert_equal '2', f.getc
assert_equal 3, f.pos
assert_equal '3', f.getc
assert_equal 4, f.pos
assert_equal '4', f.getc
end
end
Updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) almost 13 years ago
Hello,
In message "[ruby-core:43542] [ruby-trunk - Bug #6179] File::pos broken in Windows 1.9.3p125"
on Mar.22,2012 04:49:22, h.shirosaki@gmail.com wrote:
The patch is against trunk.
Could you review and try the patch?
It seems good.
Regards,¶
U.Nakamura usa@garbagecollect.jp
Updated by Anonymous almost 13 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
This issue was solved with changeset r35111.
Jason, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.
-
io.c (static int io_fflush): add the definition.
Use it in set_binary_mode_with_seek_cur(). -
io.c (set_binary_mode_with_seek_cur): refactoring to split the
content into io_unread(). Fix the possibility of buffer overflow. -
io.c (io_unread): add new implementation for Windows. Previous one
caused invalid cursor position using IO#pos with OS text mode. New
one fixes the bug. -
test/ruby/test_io_m17n.rb
(TestIO_M17N#test_pos_dont_move_cursor_position): add a test for
above bug.
[ruby-core:43497] [Bug #6179]
Updated by h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki) almost 13 years ago
I fixed it at r35111.
Please move this 1.9.3 backport.
Revisions:
34785,35095,35098,35111
Updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) almost 13 years ago
- Tracker changed from Bug to Backport
- Project changed from Ruby master to Backport193
- Category deleted (
core) - Target version deleted (
1.9.3)
moved to backport93.
BTW, you can move tickets by yourself, shirosaki-san.
Updated by h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki) over 12 years ago
- File pos_backport.patch pos_backport.patch added
usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) wrote:
moved to backport93.
BTW, you can move tickets by yourself, shirosaki-san.
Thank you.
I couldn't move this because I'm ruby-trunk
member but not yet Backport93
member on Redmine.
This ticket remains closed. Should this be opened? I can't re-open this.
Add r35152 (memory leak fix. Thanks to usa-san, nagachika-san)
Revisions:
34785,35095,35098,35111,35152
I confirmed make test
, make test-all
was good at the following revision with the backport patch.
ruby 1.9.3p173 (2012-04-01 revision 35203) [i386-mingw32]
Updated by jmthomas (Jason Thomas) over 12 years ago
This does not appear to fixed in Ruby 1.9.3p194, however your test case passes. I have created the following failing test case:
def test_pos_with_readline
t = make_tempfile
random = Random.new(1234)
open(t.path, "w") do |f|
1000.times do
f.puts "X"*random.rand(80)
end
end
i = 0
lines = open(t.path,'r').read.split("\n")
open(t.path, "r") do |f|
lines.length.times do
puts f.pos
assert_equal lines[i], f.readline.chomp
i += 1
end
end
end
Updated by luislavena (Luis Lavena) over 12 years ago
Please open a new issue so we can discuss further. The mixing between pos and readline is not clear time and your test isn't helping in that area.
Thank you.