Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
- Login: Eregon
- Registered on: 07/30/2009
- Last sign in: 11/21/2025
Issues
| open | closed | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned issues | 1 | 61 | 62 |
| Reported issues | 22 | 192 | 214 |
Projects
| Project | Roles | Registered on |
|---|---|---|
| Ruby | Committer | 08/02/2012 |
Activity
11/19/2025
-
10:37 PM Ruby Revision ba2b97a9 (git): Update to ruby/spec@6e62695
-
10:12 PM Ruby Feature #20750: Allow rb_thread_call_with_gvl to work when thread already has GVL
- kbrock (Keenan Brock) wrote:
> I'm hoping we can make `ruby_thread_has_gvl_p` a public method and no longer experimental.
This has been done as part of #20877 in https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/11975/commits/979c05185270d088b4531a6... -
08:47 PM Ruby Revision 28908a95 (git): Fix provided features spec with --repeat 2
-
12:17 PM Ruby Bug #21698 (Closed): Should simple ArgumentError refer to Object?
- It's just #19117 and it's intentional.
That feature is missing a NEWS entry though, @mame could you add one? -
11:36 AM Ruby Revision f3f3a40c (git): The C-API specs cache should be invalidated when C-API specs .c & .h files are changed
11/18/2025
-
07:50 PM Ruby Bug #21375: Set[] does not call #initialize
- jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) wrote in #note-10:
> I've submitted a PR that implements backwards compatibility for Set subclasses, without affecting Set itself: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/15228
Thank you, I think it's a good sol... -
05:54 PM Ruby Revision 0e10dfde (git): ZJIT: Inline setting Struct fields
- * Add Insn::StoreField and Insn::WriteBarrier
-
05:54 PM Ruby Revision 79633437 (git): ZJIT: Rename the operand of Insn::GuardNotFrozen from val to recv
- * When writing to an object, the receiver should be checked if it's frozen,
not the value, so this avoids an error-prone autocomplete. -
05:54 PM Ruby Revision ce73b6c0 (git): ZJIT: Pass the result of GuardNotFrozen to StoreField and WriteBarrier
-
05:36 PM Ruby Feature #21693: Allow calling any callable object as a method
- It would be a gigantic incompatibility so there is no chance for that specific syntax, as your example would call method `hello` before and no longer with your proposal.
Just
```ruby
p = 42
p(43)
```
would break for example with th...