Project

General

Profile

DevelopersMeeting20100827

  • Place
    • Epochal Tsukuba (RubyKaigi2010)
  • Date
    • 2010/08/27 10:00- (JST)
  • Attendees
    • matz (need bento)
    • ko1 (need bento)
    • mrkn (need bento)
    • nagai (need bento)
    • akr (need bento)
    • yugui (need bento)
    • shyouhei (need bento)
    • mame (need bento)
    • nobu (need bento)
    • rocky (need bento - seems like the thing to do)
    • tarui (need bento)
    • tenderlove (need bento)
    • drbrain (need bento)
    • usa (need bento)
    • kosaki (need bento)
    • kazu (need bento)
    • naruse (need bento)
    • nahi (need a bento)
    • shugo (need bento; I prefer curry)
    • kou (need bento)
    • tetsu (need bento)

If you need a bento (lunch), please write it. Expense will be collected.

'''Bento order deadline is 8/24''' <- Order is closed. We prepare 17 bentos (RubyKaigi staffs have own bento).

Agenda

  • Ruby 1.9.3 release plan (by yugui/mame)
    • Before Jul, 2011 (RubyKaigi? RubyConf?)
    • Timeline base?
    • No deadline, no code
    • Features
    • classbox?
    • MVM <- impossible
    • debug features
    • keyword argument (2.0?)
    • tuning (ko1)
  • Ruby 1.9.1 support plan?
    • yugui's matter?
    • call for maintainer?
    • 1.9.1 users?
    • yugui
    • Debian squeeze uses 1.9.1
      • ignore it?
      • give 1.9.1 to Debian?
      • no, it is 1.9.2 shortly before the 1.9.2 release
    • yugui-san decided to release 1.9.1 bugfix until Feb, 2011
  • Ruby 2.0 release plan (by matz)
    • matz; no plan about timeline
    • matz: I want to make a ruby_1_9 branch
    • yugui: 2.0?
    • classbox
    • traits
    • keyword arguments
    • compatibility?
    • -> matz: 100% compatible
      • crap
    • yugui: 1.9 should include 2.0 features, gradually
    • yugui: 1.9 branch should not be made
    • mame: can make compatible 1.9 release?
    • acceptable if well documented
    • if we have a compatibility issue on 1.9 and 2.0 development, then create 1.9 branch
  • Ruby 1.8.* release plan (by syouhei)
    • knu: ruby 1.8.8 will be release in this year.
    • knu: ruby 1.8.8 will be last release of 1.8 series.
    • knu: if there are serious issue with 1.9 series, we will release 1.8.9.
    • akr: Should 1.8.8 include 1.9.2 methods which 1.9.1 doesn't have?
    • knu: We can ignore 1.9.1.
    • knu: NEWS document is really important.
    • akr: How to maintain NEWS file? -> flush
  • The license of Ruby (by naruse)
    • naruse: GPL3 incompatible. OK: BSD -> Ruby, NG: Ruby -> BSD
    • naruse: How about to change license Ruby's and BSD?
    • ..some lawyers discussion...
    • matz: i'm thinking to change only GPL2 or later. However, not enough consideration. plus BSD seems OK. We need more law knowledge.
    • how about triple license? (BSD, GPL2 or later, Ruby's)
    • triple doesn't have any merits.
    • BSD + Ruby's?
    • matz: if no objection, changing license is ok. I wait objections for 2 weeks.
    • akr: we can't change part of ruby source code (such as win32.c).
  • Windows support in the future (by usa)
    • usa: how about to stop win32 support? (ADDED: usa is a Windows platform mgr, who is 'Usaku Nakamura')
    • nahi: On Windows, JRuby is better than CRuby. (ADDED: nahi is one of a JRuby commiter, who is 'Hiroshi Nakamura', not usa)
    • ... rubyspec discussion ...
    • usa: only mswin32. not cygwin/mingw.
    • usa: any other maintainers?
    • aaron: luis and roger?
    • usa: good.
    • matz: how about to search next maintainer before 1.9.3 release?
    • usa: agreed.
    • maintain mswin64?
    • usa: absolutely. win64 is interesting.
  • Ruby continuous integration (by tenderlove)
    • arron: Should have standard CI?
    • akr: before making such great system, we should make tests green
    • nahi: Can chkbuild split tests into small part?
    • akr: Please use your favorite tool.
    • ...
  • Debugger/Profiler/Tracer interface. See threadframe-links (by Rocky Bernstein)
  • Specification of dynamic loading (see ) and Virtual File System Interface (if we have some time (low priority), by nagai)
  • Bug ticket squash (everyone)
  • #3675
    • String#prepend => OK
    • String#append, String#>> => pending
    • Array#prepend, Array#append => pending
  • proposal for Standard C API
    • based on Rubinius's
    • will be porting 1.9.
    • approved by matz.