Bug #4008
closedRails 3::declarative_authorization::authorization_rules request => segvault ruby 1.9.2
Description
I requested the route http://localhost:3000/authorization_rules of my Rails 3 project when the development server crashed.
http://github.com/stffn/declarative_authorization
Arch Linux( Kernel: 2.6.35-ARCH )
rvm 1.0.18
Files
Updated by Feanor (mike pusti) about 14 years ago
It produces 2 different outputs
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 14 years ago
- Priority changed from 5 to 3
It's infinite recurring, seems to fail to check if the SEGV is stack orverflow, but it's not always guaranteed.
Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) over 13 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Assigned
- Assignee set to nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura)
Updated by nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura) over 13 years ago
- Target version changed from 1.9.2 to 1.9.3
Updated by nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura) over 13 years ago
- Assignee changed from nahi (Hiroshi Nakamura) to ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Here's a summary of crash.log: https://gist.github.com/1048296
As nobu said, infinite recursion should be the cause.
mike, would you please contact to declarative_authorization author for help?
Sasada-san, please close this ticket as 'Rejected(Not a bug)' if you're OK. I'm assigning you since I heard that you wanted to detect some kinds of infinite recursions as 'SystemStackError'. I don't know it's the one or not.
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) over 13 years ago
- Target version changed from 1.9.3 to 2.0.0
I send it to 1.9.x. (don't touch it before 1.9.3).
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) over 12 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Feedback
Could you try on current trunk?
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) almost 12 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.0.0 to 2.6
Updated by zzak (zzak _) over 10 years ago
No feedback for over a year, should we close this?
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) over 10 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
Seems stack overflow, probably.
1.9.2 has died long ago, and there are many changes for it.
I think there is no chance for new release.
Updated by zzak (zzak _) over 10 years ago
I am concerned about what Nahi said regarding infinite recursion handling. Also, after 2.0 Koichi asked for reproduce on trunk which makes me think he anticipates this issue > 1.9.2.
I'll leave this ticket for ko1 to determine whether or not it should be closed
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) almost 8 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
Sorry I didn't check it.
Please reopen this ticket if someone has trouble yet.